BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24369953)

  • 1. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
    Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of interval breast cancers diagnosed among participants of the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program.
    Payne JI; Caines JS; Gallant J; Foley TJ
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 23169791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
    Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography.
    Weber RJ; van Bommel RM; Louwman MW; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 27393617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missed and true interval and screen-detected breast cancers in a population based screening program.
    Hoff SR; Samset JH; Abrahamsen AL; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 21216632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assessment of the mammographic screening programme in the Azienda Sanitaria locale Provincia Milano 1 -- analysis of interval cancers and discussion of possible causes of diagnostic error.
    Burani R; Caimi F; Maggioni C; Marinoni G; Pellizzoni R; Pirola ME; Villa R; Ciatto S
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 15775895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control of mammography screening in the Veneto Region. Evaluation of four programs at a local health unit level--analysis of the frequency and diagnostic pattern of interval cancers.
    Vettorazzi M; Stocco C; Chirico A; Recanatini S; Saccon S; Mariotto R; Cinquetti S; Moretto T; Sartori P; Stomeo A; Ciatto S
    Tumori; 2006; 92(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16683376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of proportional incidence and review of interval cancer cases observed within the mammography screening programme in Trento province, Italy.
    Pellegrini M; Bernardi D; Di Michele S; Tuttobene P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Peterlongo P; Caumo F; Frigerio A; Ciatto S
    Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21744249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiological review of prior screening mammograms of screen-detected breast cancer.
    Hovda T; Tsuruda K; Hoff SR; Sahlberg KK; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2568-2579. PubMed ID: 33001307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography.
    Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 10572847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
    Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
    Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Classification and characteristics of interval cancers in the Principality of Asturias's Breast Cancer Screening Program].
    Prieto García MA; Delgado Sevillano R; Baldó Sierra C; González Díaz E; López Secades A; Llavona Amor JA; Vidal Marín B
    Radiologia; 2013 Sep; 55(5):408-15. PubMed ID: 22520555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proportional incidence and radiological review of large (T2+) breast cancers as surrogate indicators of screening programme performance.
    Ciatto S; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Borsato G; Peterlongo P; Gentilini MA; Caumo F; Frigerio A; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1250-4. PubMed ID: 22200899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.