157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24370165)
1. Feasibility of using the marginal blood vessels as reference landmarks for CT colonography.
Wei Z; Yao J; Wang S; Liu J; Dwyer AJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nowinski WL; Summers RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):W50-8. PubMed ID: 24370165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Teniae coli-based circumferential localization system for CT colonography: feasibility study.
Huang A; Roy DA; Summers RM; Franaszek M; Petrick N; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 17456877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated teniae coli detection and identification on computed tomographic colonography.
Wei Z; Yao J; Wang S; Liu J; Summers RM
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):964-75. PubMed ID: 22320805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: pilot study.
Li P; Napel S; Acar B; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Beaulieu CF
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2912-23. PubMed ID: 15543800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Registration of prone and supine CT colonography scans using correlation optimized warping and canonical correlation analysis.
Wang S; Yao J; Liu J; Petrick N; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5595-603. PubMed ID: 20095272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.
Jang JK; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26798215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normalized distance along the colon centerline: a method for correlating polyp location on CT colonography and optical colonoscopy.
Summers RM; Swift JA; Dwyer AJ; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 19843745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated centerline for computed tomography colonography.
Iordanescu G; Summers RM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):1291-301. PubMed ID: 14626304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactive registration between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography using band-height images.
Song Y; Lee H; Kang HC; Shin J; Hong GS; Park SH; Lee J; Shin YG
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jan; 80():124-136. PubMed ID: 27936413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deformable registration of supine and prone colons for computed tomographic colonography.
Suh JW; Wyatt CL
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 19940658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series.
Pickhardt PJ; Bakke J; Kuo J; Robbins JB; Lubner MG; del Rio AM; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):W623-8. PubMed ID: 25415727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Registration of prone and supine CT colonography scans based on correlation optimized warping and canonical correlation analysis.
Wang S; Yao J; Liu J; Petrick N; Summers RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():81-4. PubMed ID: 19964919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography: external clinical validation of an algorithm for computer-assisted prone and supine registration.
Boone DJ; Halligan S; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Helbren E; Slabaugh GG; McQuillan J; McClelland JR; Hu M; Punwani S; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):752-60. PubMed ID: 23687175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography: clinical evaluation of a method for automatic coregistration of polyps at follow-up surveillance studies.
Helbren E; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ; Halligan S
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 24991991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.
Gryspeerdt SS; Herman MJ; Baekelandt MA; van Holsbeeck BG; Lefere PA
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 14986055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
