These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24370331)

  • 1. Treatment and enablement in rehabilitation research.
    VanHiel LR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S88-90. PubMed ID: 24370331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contributions of treatment theory and enablement theory to rehabilitation research and practice.
    Whyte J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S17-23.e2. PubMed ID: 24370321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy and the international classification of health interventions.
    Sykes CR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S91-3. PubMed ID: 24370332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do clinicians need from a rehabilitation treatment taxonomy? An alternate approach for describing treatment content versus process.
    Fasoli SE; Chen CC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S74-6. PubMed ID: 24370328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: establishing common ground.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S1-5.e2. PubMed ID: 24370320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: implications and continuations.
    P Dijkers M; Hart T; Whyte J; M Zanca J; Packel A; Tsaousides T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S45-54.e2. PubMed ID: 24370324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a theory-driven rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: conceptual issues.
    Whyte J; Dijkers MP; Hart T; Zanca JM; Packel A; Ferraro M; Tsaousides T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S24-32.e2. PubMed ID: 24370322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: past, present, and prospects.
    Dijkers MP; Hart T; Tsaousides T; Whyte J; Zanca JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S6-16. PubMed ID: 24370326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is a rehabilitation treatment taxonomy the right answer to the rehabilitation black box?
    Cieza A; Bickenbach J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S85-7. PubMed ID: 24370330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a theory-driven classification of rehabilitation treatments.
    Hart T; Tsaousides T; Zanca JM; Whyte J; Packel A; Ferraro M; Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S33-44.e2. PubMed ID: 24370323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.
    Chan L; Heinemann AW; Roberts J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 95(3):415-7. PubMed ID: 24559651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What would Darwin say? A historical perspective on the next steps in developing a rehabilitation classification system.
    Hoenig H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S77-84. PubMed ID: 24370329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities.
    Magasi S; Wong A; Gray DB; Hammel J; Baum C; Wang CC; Heinemann AW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 25813889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Between the ideal and the real: reconsidering the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
    Conti-Becker A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2125-9. PubMed ID: 19888843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a unifying model for the conceptual description of physical and rehabilitation medicine.
    Stucki G; Melvin J
    J Rehabil Med; 2007 May; 39(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 17468800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ICF, theories, paradigms and scientific revolution. Re: Towards a unifying theory of rehabilitation.
    Reinhardt JD
    J Rehabil Med; 2011 Feb; 43(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 21305245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Guidelines of the National Consultant in the Field of Rehabilitation Medicine on the Organization and Conduct in Medical Rehabilitation, April 26, 2010.].
    Krasuski M;
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 20821885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy.
    Stucki G; Cieza A; Melvin J
    J Rehabil Med; 2007 May; 39(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 17468799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice, science and governance in interaction: European effort for the system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.
    Stucki G; Zampolini M; Juocevicius A; Negrini S; Christodoulou N
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27882907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Describing what we do: a qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on classifying rehabilitation interventions.
    Zanca JM; Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S55-65.e2. PubMed ID: 24370325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.