288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24371107)
41. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results.
Jung HJ; Hahn SY; Choi HY; Park SH; Park HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 22298871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quantitative Ultrasound Elastography With an Acoustic Coupler for Achilles Tendon Elasticity: Measurement Repeatability and Normative Values.
Yamamoto Y; Yamaguchi S; Sasho T; Fukawa T; Akatsu Y; Nagashima K; Takahashi K
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 26657752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results.
Navarro B; Ubeda B; Vallespí M; Wolf C; Casas L; Browne JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21357553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions: comparison of different elastographic features.
Ricci P; Maggini E; Mancuso E; Maldur V; Medvedyeva O; Ursu SC; Pediconi F
Acta Radiol; 2017 Oct; 58(10):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 28132531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Strain Elastography of Breast and Prostata Cancer: Similarities and Differences.
Daniaux M; Auer T; De Zordo T; Junker D; Santner W; Hubalek M; Jaschke W; Aigner F
Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 26529265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Elastographic evaluation of mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Mori M; Tsunoda H; Kawauchi N; Kikuchi M; Honda S; Suzuki K; Yamauchi H
Breast Cancer; 2012 Jan; 19(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 21643811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Does routine grading of invasive lobular cancer of the breast have the same prognostic significance as for ductal cancers?
Sinha PS; Bendall S; Bates T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 26(8):733-7. PubMed ID: 11087636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Breast Tumor Strain Ratio Is a Predictive Parameter for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer.
Kim JY; Shin JK; Lee SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):W630-8. PubMed ID: 26587952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings.
Chen YL; Gao Y; Chang C; Wang F; Zeng W; Chen JJ
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Apr; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29622044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bae JS; Chang JM; Lee SH; Shin SU; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27085697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Stiffness at shear-wave elastography and patient presentation predicts upgrade at surgery following an ultrasound-guided core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Evans A; Purdie CA; Jordan L; Macaskill EJ; Flynn J; Vinnicombe S
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1156-9. PubMed ID: 27499466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Discordant elastography images of breast lesions: how various factors lead to discordant findings.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Choi JS
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22723039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Expression of fatty acid synthase and its association with HER2 in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast].
Yang M; Xu SP; Ao QL
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 42(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 23928534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Hogan MP; Goldman DA; Dashevsky B; Riedl CC; Gönen M; Osborne JR; Jochelson M; Hudis C; Morrow M; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1674-80. PubMed ID: 26294295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
