These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24371335)

  • 1. Reliability of a minimal competency score for an annual skills mastery assessment.
    Alston GL; Haltom WR
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2013 Dec; 77(10):211. PubMed ID: 24371335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a reliable, valid annual skills mastery assessment examination.
    Alston GL; Love BL
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2010 Jun; 74(5):. PubMed ID: 20798805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and credibility of progress test criteria developed by alumni, faculty, and mixed alumni-faculty judge panels.
    Anderson HG; Nelson AA
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2011 Dec; 75(10):200. PubMed ID: 22345719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation-based examinations in physician assistant education: A comparison of two standard-setting methods.
    Carlson J; Tomkowiak J; Knott P
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2010; 21(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 21141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
    Dwyer T; Wright S; Kulasegaram KM; Theodoropoulos J; Chahal J; Wasserstein D; Ringsted C; Hodges B; Ogilvie-Harris D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():1. PubMed ID: 26727954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity of the cut score in test sets with different item amounts using the modified Angoff, modified Ebel, and Hofstee standard-setting methods for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Park J; Yim MK; Kim NJ; Ahn DS; Kim YM
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():28. PubMed ID: 33010798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korea Radiological technologist Licensing Examination : Angoff, Ebel, Bookmark, and Hofstee.
    Park J; Ahn DS; Yim MK; Lee J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():32. PubMed ID: 30586956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of Interrater Reliability of a Universal Evaluator Rubric to Assess Student Pharmacist Communication Skills.
    Barnett SG; Allen SM; Bastianelli KM; Chen JS; Clark Dula CA; Kachlic MD; Goliak KL; Knockel LE; Matthews DE; Volino LR; Lasarev MR; Reist JC
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2022 Jan; 86(1):8544. PubMed ID: 34301546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of patient communication skills during OSCE: examining effectiveness of a training program in minimizing inter-grader variability.
    Schwartzman E; Hsu DI; Law AV; Chung EP
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 21555198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Trainee Performance Data on Standard-Setting Judgments Using the Mastery Angoff Method.
    Prenner SB; McGaghie WC; Chuzi S; Cantey E; Didwania A; Barsuk JH
    J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 10(3):301-305. PubMed ID: 29946387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competency-based Standard Setting for a High-stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Validity Evidence.
    Lee M; Hernandez E; Brook R; Ha E; Harris C; Plesa M; Kahn D
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():200. PubMed ID: 38074586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the Angoff method to set a standard on mock exams for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Yim MK; Shin S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():14. PubMed ID: 32316708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students.
    Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2002 Sep; 36(9):860-7. PubMed ID: 12354249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study.
    Kim DH; Kang YJ; Park HK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():33. PubMed ID: 36503200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method.
    Jalili M; Hejri SM; Norcini JJ
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of different standard-setting methods for professional qualifying dental examination.
    Abd-Rahman ANA; Baharuddin IH; Abu-Hassan MI; Davies SJ
    J Dent Educ; 2021 Jul; 85(7):1210-1216. PubMed ID: 33792052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and Assessment of a Horizontally Integrated Biological Sciences Course Sequence for Pharmacy Education.
    Dirks-Naylor AJ; Wright NJ; Alston GL
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2015 Aug; 79(6):89. PubMed ID: 26430276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation and Assessment of a Novel APPE Intersession Course to Assess Near-Terminal Student Competence.
    Blackmer AB; Thompson M; Brunner JM; Patel T; Saseen JJ
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Dec; 82(10):6460. PubMed ID: 30643309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Faculty Evaluations Correlate Poorly with Medical Student Examination Performance in a Fourth-Year Emergency Medicine Clerkship.
    Dubosh NM; Fisher J; Lewis J; Ullman EA
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Jun; 52(6):850-855. PubMed ID: 28341085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.