BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24372629)

  • 1. Analysis of HER2 status in breast carcinoma by fully automated HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): comparison of two immunohistochemical tests and manual FISH.
    Yoon N; Do IG; Cho EY
    APMIS; 2014 Sep; 122(9):755-60. PubMed ID: 24372629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated processing of fluorescence in-situ hybridization slides for HER2 testing in breast and gastro-esophageal carcinomas.
    Tafe LJ; Allen SF; Steinmetz HB; Dokus BA; Cook LJ; Marotti JD; Tsongalis GJ
    Exp Mol Pathol; 2014 Aug; 97(1):116-9. PubMed ID: 24927872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of automated and manual determination of HER2 status in breast cancer for diagnostic use: a comparative methodological study using the Ventana BenchMark automated staining system and manual tests.
    Bánkfalvi A; Boecker W; Reiner A
    Int J Oncol; 2004 Oct; 25(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 15375542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques.
    Ellis CM; Dyson MJ; Stephenson TJ; Maltby EL
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):710-4. PubMed ID: 15976337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based comparison between the Oracle HER2 Bond Immunohistochemical System, Dako HercepTest, and Vysis PathVysion HER2 FISH using both commercially validated and modified ASCO/CAP and United Kingdom HER2 IHC scoring guidelines.
    O'Grady A; Allen D; Happerfield L; Johnson N; Provenzano E; Pinder SE; Tee L; Gu M; Kay EW
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 20661132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the HER2 amplification status in oesophageal adenocarcinoma by conventional and automated FISH: a tissue microarray study.
    Prins MJ; Ruurda JP; van Diest PJ; van Hillegersberg R; ten Kate FJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24043715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Pathvysion and Poseidon HER2 FISH assays in measuring HER2 amplification in breast cancer: a validation study.
    Francz M; Egervari K; Kardos L; Toth J; Nemes Z; Szanto J; Szollosi Z
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 19965795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
    Kiyose S; Igarashi H; Nagura K; Kamo T; Kawane K; Mori H; Ozawa T; Maeda M; Konno K; Hoshino H; Konno H; Ogura H; Shinmura K; Hattori N; Sugimura H
    Pathol Int; 2012 Nov; 62(11):728-34. PubMed ID: 23121603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HER2 assessment by immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization: comparison of HercepTest and PathVysion commercial assays.
    McCormick SR; Lillemoe TJ; Beneke J; Schrauth J; Reinartz J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jun; 117(6):935-43. PubMed ID: 12047146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
    Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction detection of HER2 amplification in formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast and gastric carcinoma samples.
    Zhu Y; Lu D; Lira ME; Xu Q; Du Y; Xiong J; Mao M; Chung HC; Zheng G
    Exp Mol Pathol; 2016 Apr; 100(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 26626802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a fully automated HER2 staining kit in breast cancer.
    Moelans CB; Kibbelaar RE; van den Heuvel MC; Castigliego D; de Weger RA; van Diest PJ
    Cell Oncol; 2010; 32(1-2):149-55. PubMed ID: 20203372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating HER2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer.
    Bartlett JM; Going JJ; Mallon EA; Watters AD; Reeves JR; Stanton P; Richmond J; Donald B; Ferrier R; Cooke TG
    J Pathol; 2001 Nov; 195(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 11745673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in paraffin-embedded breast cancer.
    Lottner C; Schwarz S; Diermeier S; Hartmann A; Knuechel R; Hofstaedter F; Brockhoff G
    J Pathol; 2005 Apr; 205(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 15732132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HER-2 status in breast cancer: correlation of gene amplification by FISH with immunohistochemistry expression using advanced cellular imaging system.
    Ciampa A; Xu B; Ayata G; Baiyee D; Wallace J; Wertheimer M; Edmiston K; Khan A
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2006 Jun; 14(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 16785779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of dual-color in-situ hybridization and fluorescence in-situ hybridization in HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
    Horii R; Matsuura M; Iwase T; Ito Y; Akiyama F
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 23307494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer: comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility.
    Powell WC; Hicks DG; Prescott N; Tarr SM; Laniauskas S; Williams T; Short S; Pettay J; Nagle RB; Dabbs DJ; Scott KM; Brown RW; Grogan T; Roche PC; Tubbs RR
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2007 Mar; 15(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 17536315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automation of manual components and image quantification of direct dual label fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene amplification: A feasibility study.
    Tubbs RR; Pettay JD; Swain E; Roche PC; Powell W; Hicks DG; Grogan T
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2006 Dec; 14(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 17122642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully automated fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) staining and digital analysis of HER2 in breast cancer: a validation study.
    van der Logt EM; Kuperus DA; van Setten JW; van den Heuvel MC; Boers JE; Schuuring E; Kibbelaar RE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123201. PubMed ID: 25844540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting antibodies to detect HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry in invasive mammary carcinomas.
    Gouvêa AP; Milanezi F; Olson SJ; Leitao D; Schmitt FC; Gobbi H
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2006 Mar; 14(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 16540740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.