These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24372898)
21. Does the amount of filler content in sealants used to prevent decalcification on smooth enamel surfaces really matter? Van Bebber L; Campbell PM; Honeyman AL; Spears R; Buschang PH Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 20936966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro secondary caries inhibition by adhesive systems in enamel around composite restorations. Pinto CF; Paes-Leme AF; Ambrosano GM; Giannini M Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 20533636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Kinetics of enamel demineralization in vitro. Margolis HC; Zhang YP; Lee CY; Kent RL; Moreno EC J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1326-35. PubMed ID: 10403460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inhibition of enamel mineral loss by fissure sealant: an in situ study. Kantovitz KR; Pascon FM; Nociti FH; Tabchoury CP; Puppin-Rontani RM J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23044387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of Surface Pre-Reacted Glass Ionomer Containing Dental Sealant on the Inhibition of Enamel Demineralization. Ogawa Y; Sayed M; Hiraishi N; Al-Haj Husain N; Tagami J; Özcan M; Shimada Y J Funct Biomater; 2022 Oct; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36278658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Irinoda Y; Matsumura Y; Kito H; Nakano T; Toyama T; Nakagaki H; Tsuchiya T Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 11203831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and release of fluoride from experimental resin-based composites depending on surface treatment and S-PRG filler particle fraction. Hahnel S; Wastl DS; Schneider-Feyrer S; Giessibl FJ; Brambilla E; Cazzaniga G; Ionescu A J Adhes Dent; 2014 Aug; 16(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 24669368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Protective effect of pit and fissure sealants on demineralization of adjacent enamel. ; ; ; Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):491-5. PubMed ID: 22353408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal seal evaluation of different resin sealants used in pits and fissures. An in vitro study. Montanari M; Pitzolu G; Felline C; Piana G Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 9(3):125-31. PubMed ID: 18844441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optical coherence tomography for evaluation of enamel and protective coatings. Alsayed EZ; Hariri I; Sadr A; Nakashima S; Bakhsh TA; Shimada Y; Sumi Y; Tagami J Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 25748465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro testing of all-in-one adhesives as fissure sealants. Hori M; Yoshida E; Hashimoto M; Kaga M; Sano H; Oguchi H Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 15301214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fluoride pit and fissure sealants: a review. Morphis TL; Toumba KJ; Lygidakis NA Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 10(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 11310107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Protection of sound enamel and artificial enamel lesions against demineralisation: caries infiltrant versus adhesive. Schmidlin PR; Sener B; Attin T; Wiegand A J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):851-6. PubMed ID: 22800853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of the application time on the penetration of different dental adhesives and a fissure sealant into artificial subsurface lesions in bovine enamel. Meyer-Lueckel H; Paris S; Mueller J; Cölfen H; Kielbassa AM Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 16040112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surface topography and enamel-resin interface of pit and fissure sealants following visible light and argon laser polymerization: an in vitro study. Hicks MJ; Westerman GH; Flaitz CM; Powell GL ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(3):169-75, 160. PubMed ID: 10902074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: influence of the application procedure. Mueller J; Meyer-Lueckel H; Paris S; Hopfenmuller W; Kielbassa AM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 16802642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. pH-responsive calcium and phosphate-ion releasing antibacterial sealants on carious enamel lesions in vitro. Ibrahim MS; Balhaddad AA; Garcia IM; Collares FM; Weir MD; Xu HHK; Melo MAS J Dent; 2020 Jun; 97():103323. PubMed ID: 32360313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Rationale for caries inhibition of debonded glass ionomer sealants: an in vitro study. Smith NK; Morris KT; Wells M; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):464-7. PubMed ID: 25514073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the ions release / incorporation of the prototype S-PRG filler-containing endodontic sealer. Han L; Okiji T Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 22123015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]