These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24373113)

  • 21. Cost-utility of exenatide once weekly compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK.
    Beaudet A; Palmer JL; Timlin L; Wilson B; Bruhn D; Boye KS; Lloyd A
    J Med Econ; 2011; 14(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 21563878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Short-term cost-utility of degludec versus glargine U100 for patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular events: A Canadian setting (DEVOTE 9).
    Pollock RF; Heller S; Pieber TR; Woo V; Gundgaard J; Hallén N; Luckevich M; Tutkunkardas D; Zinman B;
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Jul; 21(7):1706-1714. PubMed ID: 30924579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Glargine Versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes in Thailand.
    Permsuwan U; Chaiyakunapruk N; Dilokthornsakul P; Thavorn K; Saokaew S
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 26961276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly compared with exenatide twice daily and insulin glargine for the treatment of patients with type two diabetes and body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) in Spain.
    Fonseca T; Clegg J; Caputo G; Norrbacka K; Dilla T; Alvarez M
    J Med Econ; 2013 Jul; 16(7):926-38. PubMed ID: 23659201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL Versus Insulin Degludec for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in China.
    Su W; Li C; Zhang L; Lin Z; Tan J; Xuan J
    Diabetes Ther; 2019 Oct; 10(5):1969-1984. PubMed ID: 31482483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rates of hypoglycaemia are lower in patients treated with insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) than with IDeg or insulin glargine, regardless of the hypoglycaemia definition used.
    Norwood P; Chen R; Jaeckel E; Lingvay I; Jarlov H; Lehmann L; Heller S
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1562-1569. PubMed ID: 28417535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The management of type 2 diabetes with fixed-ratio combination insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart): A short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting.
    Drummond R; Malkin S; Du Preez M; Lee XY; Hunt B
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2018 Oct; 20(10):2371-2378. PubMed ID: 29797389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical outcomes in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes switching from first- to second-generation basal insulin analogues: Comparative effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec in the DELIVER D+ cohort study.
    Sullivan SD; Bailey TS; Roussel R; Zhou FL; Bosnyak Z; Preblick R; Westerbacka J; Gupta RA; Blonde L
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2018 Sep; 20(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 29938887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with sub-optimally controlled type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom.
    Woehl A; Evans M; Tetlow AP; McEwan P
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2008 Aug; 7():24. PubMed ID: 18694484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of switching to insulin degludec from other basal insulins in real-world clinical practice in Italy.
    Haldrup S; Lapolla A; Gundgaard J; Wolden ML
    J Med Econ; 2020 Mar; 23(3):271-279. PubMed ID: 31526202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Insulin degludec early clinical experience: does the promise from the clinical trials translate into clinical practice--a case-based evaluation.
    Evans M; McEwan P; Foos V
    J Med Econ; 2015 Feb; 18(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 25325179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Multinational, Randomized, Open-label, Treat-to-Target Trial Comparing Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Pan C; Gross JL; Yang W; Lv X; Sun L; Hansen CT; Xu H; Wagner R
    Drugs R D; 2016 Jun; 16(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 27098525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of exenatide twice daily vs insulin glargine as add-on therapy to oral antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes in China.
    Gu S; Wang X; Qiao Q; Gao W; Wang J; Dong H
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 28452095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost effectiveness of insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetes drugs compared with premixed insulin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada.
    Tunis SL; Sauriol L; Minshall ME
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(4):267-80. PubMed ID: 20578781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden.
    Ericsson Å; Lundqvist A
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Apr; 15(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 28063135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness of detemir-based basal/bolus therapy versus NPH-based basal/bolus therapy for type 1 diabetes in a UK setting: an economic analysis based on meta-analysis results of four clinical trials.
    Palmer AJ; Roze S; Valentine WJ; Smith I; Wittrup-Jensen KU
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Nov; 20(11):1729-46. PubMed ID: 15537473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical perspectives from the BEGIN and EDITION programmes: Trial-level meta-analyses outcomes with either degludec or glargine 300U/mL vs glargine 100U/mL in T2DM.
    Roussel R; Ritzel R; Boëlle-Le Corfec E; Balkau B; Rosenstock J
    Diabetes Metab; 2018 Nov; 44(5):402-409. PubMed ID: 29548798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PATIENTS ACHIEVING GOOD GLYCEMIC CONTROL (HBA1c <7%) EXPERIENCE A LOWER RATE OF HYPOGLYCEMIA WITH INSULIN DEGLUDEC THAN WITH INSULIN GLARGINE: A META-ANALYSIS OF PHASE 3A TRIALS.
    Einhorn D; Handelsman Y; Bode BW; Endahl LA; Mersebach H; King AB
    Endocr Pract; 2015 Aug; 21(8):917-26. PubMed ID: 26121451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes: results of a Chinese cohort from a multinational randomized controlled trial].
    Mu YM; Guo LX; Li L; Li YM; Xu XJ; Li QM; Xu MT; Zhu LY; Yuan GY; Liu Y; Xu C; Wang ZJ; Shen FX; Luo Y; Liu JY; Li QF; Wang WH; Lai XY; Xu HF; Pan CY
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 56(9):660-666. PubMed ID: 28870034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduced risk of hypoglycemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring high doses of basal insulin: a meta-analysis of 5 randomized begin trials.
    Rodbard HW; Gough S; Lane W; Korsholm L; Bretler DM; Handelsman Y
    Endocr Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 24246344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.