244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24373559)
1. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review.
Pittayapat P; Limchaichana-Bolstad N; Willems G; Jacobs R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):69-91. PubMed ID: 24373559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry: a systematic review.
Smektała T; Jędrzejewski M; Szyndel J; Sporniak-Tutak K; Olszewski R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 25037877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of inter- and intra-operator cephalometric tracings on cone beam CT radiographs: comparison of the precision of the cone beam CT versus the latero-lateral radiograph tracing.
Farronato G; Salvadori S; Nolet F; Zoia A; Farronato D
Prog Orthod; 2014 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 24393493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes.
Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric landmark identification consistency between undergraduate dental students and orthodontic residents in 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study.
Míguez-Contreras M; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Romero-Maroto M; López-de-Andrés A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28024771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
