BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24373661)

  • 21. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of three-dimensional digital models for the morphometric analysis of predentition plasters: accuracy and precision.
    Kaihara Y; Katayama A; Iwamae S; Kihara T; Ono K; Kurose M; Amano H; Nikawa H; Kozai K
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 25517580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars.
    Legović M; Novosel A; Legović A
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 12828441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
    Celikoglu M; Nur M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS; Bayram M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24380134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
    Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a photographic method to measure dental angulation.
    Amorim JR; Macedo DV; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 24945518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of normal permanent and primary dentition sagittal tooth-crown inclinations of Japanese females.
    Inada E; Saitoh I; Hayasaki H; Iwase Y; Kubota N; Takemoto Y; Yamasaki Y
    Cranio; 2012 Jan; 30(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 22435176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overjet at the anterior and posterior segments: three-dimensional analysis of arch coordination.
    Kook YA; Bayome M; Park SB; Cha BK; Lee YW; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 19413384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
    Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners: effects of the presence of orthodontic brackets and wire.
    Jung YR; Park JM; Chun YS; Lee KN; Kim M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 27644178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validity, reliability, and time requirement of study model analysis using cone-beam computed tomography-generated virtual study models.
    Luu NS; Mandich MA; Flores-Mir C; El-Bialy T; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 23590668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tooth inclination in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging.
    Fukagawa H; Motegi E; Fuma A; Nomura M; Kano M; Sueishi K; Okano S
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 20689237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of linear and angular dental measurements with the OrthoMechanics Sequential Analyzer.
    Talaat S; Kaboudan A; Breuning H; Ragy N; Elshebiny T; Kula K; Ghoneima A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 25636561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.