225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24376016)
1. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions' preliminary experience.
Bogliolo S; Mereu L; Cassani C; Gardella B; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Babilonti L; Delpezzo C; Tateo S; Spinillo A
Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25231021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Tang FH; Tsai EM
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():1827913. PubMed ID: 28373977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions.
Terzi H; Biler A; Demirtas O; Guler OT; Peker N; Kale A
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():51-57. PubMed ID: 27633451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gynaecological robotic surgery at a state hospital - our own experience.
Kadioglu BG; Kumtepe Y; Baran FS
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(9):495-499. PubMed ID: 30318576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic single-site surgery in benign gynecologic diseases: Experiences and learning curve based on 626 robotic cases at a single institute.
Yoo HK; Cho A; Cho EH; Kim SJ; Shim JE; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1885-1892. PubMed ID: 32686302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic hysterectomy using the Vessel Sealer for myomatous uteri: technique and clinical outcome.
Hoste G; Van Trappen P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():241-4. PubMed ID: 26454809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Siedhoff MT; Carey ET; Findley AD; Riggins LE; Garrett JM; Steege JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.
Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital.
Mäenpää M; Nieminen K; Tomás E; Luukkaala T; Mäenpää JU
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 25721212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
