331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24376537)
1. Modified McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 5-year retrospective study of 142 patients in a single institution.
Chen B; Zhang B; Zhu C; Ye Z; Wang C; Ma D; Ye M; Kong M; Jin J; Lin J; Wu C; Wang Z; Ye J; Zhang J; Hu Q
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82428. PubMed ID: 24376537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Liu B; Qiu ML; Feng Z; Lin NL; Yu MJ; Li X
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 101(29):2316-2321. PubMed ID: 34333948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience.
Zheng XD; Li SC; Lu C; Zhang WM; Hou JB; Shi KF; Zhang P
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Mar; 17(1):36. PubMed ID: 35292067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable approach for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
Ma J; Wang W; Zhang B; Li X; Wu J; Wu Z
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Jan; 46(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 33678638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
Yao F; Wang J; Yao J; Xu L; Qian J; Cao Y
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():105-109. PubMed ID: 29061388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Versus Open McKeown for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Zheng Y; Li Y; Liu X; Sun H; Shen S; Ba Y; Wang Z; Liu S; Xing W
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6329-6336. PubMed ID: 33987755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.
Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC
World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: Pneumatic Mediastinoscopy Versus Thoracoscopy.
Jin Y; Lu X; Xue L; Zhao X
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 May; 29(5):638-642. PubMed ID: 30562122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of postoperative complications on survival of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Tan QY; Jiang YG; Guo W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 27924395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
