These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24376684)

  • 1. Effects of spatial pattern scale of brain activity on the sensitivity of DOT, fMRI, EEG and MEG.
    Perdue KL; Diamond SG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83299. PubMed ID: 24376684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. fMRI-EEG integrated cortical source imaging by use of time-variant spatial constraints.
    Liu Z; He B
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1198-214. PubMed ID: 18036833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similarities between simulated spatial spectra of scalp EEG, MEG and structural MRI.
    Ramon C; Freeman WJ; Holmes M; Ishimaru A; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH; Rezvanian E
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 19557510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI.
    Garcés P; Pereda E; Hernández-Tamames JA; Del-Pozo F; Maestú F; Pineda-Pardo JÁ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 26503502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Field Spread on Resting-State Magneto Encephalography Functional Network Analysis: A Computational Modeling Study.
    Silva Pereira S; Hindriks R; Mühlberg S; Maris E; van Ede F; Griffa A; Hagmann P; Deco G
    Brain Connect; 2017 Nov; 7(9):541-557. PubMed ID: 28875718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing.
    McDonald CR; Thesen T; Carlson C; Blumberg M; Girard HM; Trongnetrpunya A; Sherfey JS; Devinsky O; Kuzniecky R; Dolye WK; Cash SS; Leonard MK; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):707-17. PubMed ID: 20620212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and magnetoencephalography evoked responses yield different neural functionality in reading.
    Vartiainen J; Liljeström M; Koskinen M; Renvall H; Salmelin R
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 31(3):1048-58. PubMed ID: 21248130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A methodological framework for inverse-modeling of propagating cortical activity using MEG/EEG.
    Hindriks R
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117345. PubMed ID: 32896634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):775-95. PubMed ID: 22102512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects.
    Liljeström M; Hultén A; Parkkonen L; Salmelin R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1845-56. PubMed ID: 19378277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.