252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24377590)
1. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for human papillomavirus persistence among women undergoing cold-knife conization for treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Togrul C; Caglar M; Gungor T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 24726620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Prognostic factors of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated by cold knife conization with negative margin].
Meng QW; Qin ZH; Mao Y; Zhao XD
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 42(7):457-9. PubMed ID: 17961334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cold-knife conization versus photodynamic therapy with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II with associated human papillomavirus infection: a comparison of preliminary results.
Bodner K; Bodner-Adler B; Wierrani F; Kubin A; Szölts-Szölts J; Spängler B; Grünberger W
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(2C):1785-8. PubMed ID: 12820459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Zhang W; Lin Y
J Int Med Res; 2022 Jun; 50(6):3000605221106414. PubMed ID: 35726589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of pregnancies after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
Demeter A; Sziller I; Csapó Z; Szánthó A; Papp Z
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 12094956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.
Li X; Liu M; Ji Y; Qu P
BMC Surg; 2021 May; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 33975589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins.
Reich O; Pickel H; Lahousen M; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):428-30. PubMed ID: 11239650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: relation between colposcopically directed biopsy, conization and cervical loop excision.
Murta EF; Conti R; Rodovalho J; Barcelos AC; Adad SJ; de Souza H
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):587-90. PubMed ID: 15493171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
