These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24377590)
81. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix: 110 cases treated by cold-knife conization. Margariti PA; Balsamo G; Gullotta G; Rabitti C; Valle D; Mancuso S Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 9641225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization. Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Cold Knife Versus Carbon Dioxide for the Treatment of Preinvasive Cervical Lesion. Ferrari F; Bonetti E; Oliveri G; Giannini A; Gozzini E; Conforti J; Ferrari FA; Salinaro F; Tisi G; Ciravolo G; Favilli A; Odicino F Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jun; 60(7):. PubMed ID: 39064486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Houfflin Debarge V; Collinet P; Vinatier D; Ego A; Dewilde A; Boman F; Leroy JL Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Sep; 90(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 13678729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins. Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability. Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up. Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Clinical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnant and postpartum women. Wu YM; Wang T; He Y; Song F; Wang Y; Zhu L; Kong WM; Duan W; Zhang WY Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):1071-7. PubMed ID: 24196304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. [Diagnosis and treatment of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cervical conization in 98 patients]. Chen W; Guan T Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1642-4, 1647. PubMed ID: 20650790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. [Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization]. Nordland K; Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jan; 125(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 15665889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision. Giacalone PL; Laffargue F; Aligier N; Roger P; Combecal J; Daures JP Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 10600289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Residual disease following conization of women with stage IA-IB1 cervical carcinoma in a high incidence region. Chatchotikawong U; Ruengkhachorn I; Leelaphatanadit C Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(17):7383-7. PubMed ID: 25227846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Follow-up by combined cytology and human papillomavirus testing for patients post-cone biopsy: results of a long-term follow-up. Bar-Am A; Gamzu R; Levin I; Fainaru O; Niv J; Almog B Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 14529675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. The expression of p16 (INK4a) and Ki-67 in relation to high-risk human papilloma viral load and residual disease after conization with positive margins. Song SH; Park HM; Eom DW; Lee JK; Lee NW; Kim AR; Hur JY; Lee KW; Park YK; Saw HS Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(4):858-67. PubMed ID: 17367326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after "coin-shaped" conization. Kim M; Ishioka S; Endo T; Baba T; Saito T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 293(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 26305031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]