These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24377697)
1. Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging. Szychta P; Raine C; Butterworth M; Stewart K; Witmanowski H; Zadrozny M; Rykala J Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jan; 44():136-43. PubMed ID: 24377697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative breast volume evaluation of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using three-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Chen K; Feng CJ; Ma H; Hsiao FY; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Huang LY; Yu WC; Perng CK J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 82(9):732-739. PubMed ID: 31335631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction. Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D volumetric analysis for planning breast reconstructive surgery. Chae MP; Hunter-Smith DJ; Spychal RT; Rozen WM Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jul; 146(2):457-60. PubMed ID: 24939062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Gladilin E; Gabrielova B; Montemurro P; Hedén P Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 21184065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The stable status evaluation for female breast implant surgery by calculating related physics parameters. Sun SP; Hsu KW; Chen JS Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 May; 90(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 18164780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Computer-based preoperative planning for breast reconstruction in the woman with unilateral breast hypoplasia]. Raposio E; Caregnato P; Barabino P; Gualdi A; Orefice A; Spagnolo A; Capello C; Santi PL Minerva Chir; 2002 Oct; 57(5):711-4. PubMed ID: 12370677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications. Davila AA; Mioton LM; Chow G; Wang E; Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; Fine N; Kim JY J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Oct; 47(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 23547540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Yip JM; Mouratova N; Jeffery RM; Veitch DE; Woodman RJ; Dean NR Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 68(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 21587046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment. Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adipose-tissue grafting to the post-mastectomy irradiated chest wall: preparing the ground for implant reconstruction. Sarfati I; Ihrai T; Kaufman G; Nos C; Clough KB J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 21514910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-step breast reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants after skin-sparing mastectomy. Rancati A; Soderini A; Dorr J; Gercovich G; Tessari L; Gonzalez E J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1671-5. PubMed ID: 23932524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antibiotic selection for the treatment of infectious complications of implant-based breast reconstruction. Weichman KE; Levine SM; Wilson SC; Choi M; Karp NS Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 23486147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]