182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24377820)
1. The impact of template format on the completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M; Touriz M; Renshaw A; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jan; 138(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 24377820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E
Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Accuracy and Speed of Information Identification by Nonpathologists in Synoptic Reports With Different Formats.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 141(3):418-422. PubMed ID: 28055242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical pathology report defects: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 73 institutions.
Volmar KE; Idowu MO; Hunt JL; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 May; 138(5):602-12. PubMed ID: 24786118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Saladino AJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):951-6. PubMed ID: 9822122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of parameters to ensure quality control in histopathology reporting: a meta-analysis at a tertiary care center.
Qureshi A; Loya A; Azam M; Hussain M; Mushtaq S; Mahmood T
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 22771639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunities for Improvement in Pathology Reporting of Childhood Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Report From Children's Oncology Group (COG) Study ARST0332.
Black JO; Coffin CM; Parham DM; Hawkins DS; Speights RA; Spunt SL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):328-38. PubMed ID: 27510717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interinstitutional assessment of colorectal carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of practice patterns from 532 laboratories and 15,940 reports.
Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1113-9. PubMed ID: 1444738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validating Laboratory Results in Electronic Health Records: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study.
Perrotta PL; Karcher DS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Sep; 140(9):926-31. PubMed ID: 27575266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories.
Hassell LA; Parwani AV; Weiss L; Jones MA; Ye J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20670135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voice recognition technology implementation in surgical pathology: advantages and limitations.
Singh M; Pal TR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1476-81. PubMed ID: 22032576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synoptic pathology reporting for thyroid cancer: a review and institutional experience.
Lam E; Vy N; Bajdik C; Strugnell SS; Walker B; Wiseman SM
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1073-9. PubMed ID: 24053206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
