199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24377910)
1. Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.
Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Cuervo VA; Murrie DC; Clark JW
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):418-27. PubMed ID: 24377910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?
Hanson RK; Thornton D; Helmus LM; Babchishin KM
Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):218-52. PubMed ID: 25810478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying the relative risk of sex offenders: risk ratios for static-99R.
Hanson RK; Babchishin KM; Helmus L; Thornton D
Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):482-515. PubMed ID: 23264543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders.
Leguízamo A; Lee SC; Jeglic EL; Calkins C
Sex Abuse; 2017 Dec; 29(8):765-785. PubMed ID: 26680251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Same Score, Different Audience, Different Message: Perceptions of Sex Offense Risk Depend on Static-99R Risk Level and Personality Factors of the Recipient.
Lehmann RJB; Schäfer T; Helmus LM; Henniges J; Fleischhauer M
Sex Abuse; 2023 Oct; 35(7):863-895. PubMed ID: 36720719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever.
Hanson RK; Harris AJ; Helmus L; Thornton D
J Interpers Violence; 2014 Oct; 29(15):2792-813. PubMed ID: 24664250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools.
Hanson RK; Babchishin KM; Helmus LM; Thornton D; Phenix A
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):582-597. PubMed ID: 27618202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive Validity of Static-99R Among 8,207 Men Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korea: A Prospective Field Study.
Lee SC; Hanson RK; Yoon JS
Sex Abuse; 2023 Sep; 35(6):687-715. PubMed ID: 36394612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Static-99R reporting practices in sexually violent predator cases: Does norm selection reflect adversarial allegiance?
Chevalier CS; Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Varela JG
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 25495715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three Central Dimensions of Sexual Recidivism Risk: Understanding the Latent Constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R.
Brouillette-Alarie S; Proulx J; Hanson RK
Sex Abuse; 2018 Sep; 30(6):676-704. PubMed ID: 28183223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland.
Gonçalves LC; Gerth J; Rossegger A; Noll T; Endrass J
Sex Abuse; 2020 Mar; 32(2):203-219. PubMed ID: 30623752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of High-Intensity Inpatient Sex Offender Treatment in the Netherlands.
Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
Sex Abuse; 2016 Aug; 28(5):469-85. PubMed ID: 24867416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk assessment communication difficulties: An empirical examination of the effects of categorical versus probabilistic risk communication in sexually violent predator decisions.
Krauss DA; Cook GI; Klapatch L
Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):532-553. PubMed ID: 30294807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive Accuracy of Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version Risk and Change Scores in Treated Canadian Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Sexual Offenders.
Olver ME; Sowden JN; Kingston DA; Nicholaichuk TP; Gordon A; Beggs Christofferson SM; Wong SCP
Sex Abuse; 2018 Apr; 30(3):254-275. PubMed ID: 27189355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 2015 Static-99R: Alternative Recidivism Tables for High-Risk Offenders.
Elwood RW; Kelley SM; Mundt JC
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Oct; 61(14):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 26758206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
