These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 243781)

  • 1. A paradigm for faculty evaluation.
    Ketefian S
    Nurs Outlook; 1977 Nov; 25(11):718-20. PubMed ID: 243781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The chaos surrounding faculty evaluation.
    Fitzpatrick JJ
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(4):177. PubMed ID: 16921798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaping the professional rewards of faculty evaluation.
    Cudney SA
    Nurs Health Care; 1985 Oct; 6(8):451-7. PubMed ID: 3851197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Faculty performance evaluation: the CIPP-SAPS model.
    Mitcham M
    J Allied Health; 1981 Nov; 10(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 7328038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic faculty evaluation: a growing critical concern.
    Bobbitt KC
    J Nurs Educ; 1985 Feb; 24(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 2984376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of teaching: a review of the literature.
    Ward-Griffin C; Brown B
    J Adv Nurs; 1992 Dec; 17(12):1408-14. PubMed ID: 1474238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-reported competency of public health nurses and faculty in Illinois.
    Issel LM; Baldwin KA; Lyons RL; Madamala K
    Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 16684191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faculty perceptions of faculty evaluation by students.
    Freund B
    Nurse Educ; 1989; 14(5):20, 26. PubMed ID: 2797513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Faculty peer review.
    Gorecki Y
    Nurs Outlook; 1977 Jul; 25(7):439-42. PubMed ID: 586589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of faculty teaching effectiveness--toward accountability in education.
    Gien LT
    J Nurs Educ; 1991 Feb; 30(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 1849568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faculty evaluation: our shackle or parachute?
    Sullivan MJ
    Nurs Health Care; 1985 Oct; 6(8):446-8. PubMed ID: 3851196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation tools: student's assessment of faculty.
    Brown DL; Hayes ER
    Nurs Outlook; 1979 Dec; 27(12):778-81. PubMed ID: 259999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faculty evaluation: a closer look at peer evaluation.
    Andrusyszyn MA
    Nurse Educ Today; 1990 Dec; 10(6):410-4. PubMed ID: 2266929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of faculty and administrators in hygiene programs.
    Tarkowski MR
    Educ Dir Dent Aux; 1984 Sep; 9(3):10-5. PubMed ID: 6593215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Faculty evaluation in nursing.
    Ezhilarasu P
    Nurs J India; 1992 Mar; 83(3):56-7. PubMed ID: 1304042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The process of faculty evaluation.
    Smeltzer C
    NLN Publ; 1978; (16-1749):19-34. PubMed ID: 250714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer evaluation: a component of faculty performance appraisal.
    Harwood CH; Olson J
    J Nurs Educ; 1988 Oct; 27(8):377-9. PubMed ID: 2852231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of nursing instructors. Chosing significant criteria].
    St-Julien D
    Nurs Que; 1990; 10(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 2300317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clarifying tenure requirements.
    Freeman LH; Voignier RR
    Nurs Outlook; 1985; 33(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 3844151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical colleagues as a source of data for faculty evaluation.
    Whitman NI
    West J Nurs Res; 1990 Oct; 12(5):644-58. PubMed ID: 2238642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.