These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 243781)

  • 21. Nursing education/service. Contracting for growth.
    Aroian J; Grant KJ; Gilbert JP
    Am J Nurs; 1984 Aug; 84(8):1042, 1044. PubMed ID: 6565461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developing performance criteria for merit pay: one school's process.
    Jenkins HM; Dienemann JA; Boland ML
    J Prof Nurs; 1988; 4(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 3397449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria.
    Dienemann J; Shaffer C
    J Prof Nurs; 1992; 8(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 1634655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical track faculty: merits and issues.
    Lee WH; Kim CJ; Roh YS; Shin H; Kim MJ
    J Prof Nurs; 2007; 23(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 17292128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using a faculty evaluation triad to achieve evidence-based teaching.
    Appling SE; Naumann PL; Berk RA
    Nurs Health Care Perspect; 2001; 22(5):247-51. PubMed ID: 15957402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A current ranking of nursing schools.
    Chamings PA; Parrish RS; Hargett MV
    Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 2342889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Standards for performance appraisal of academic staff at a nursing college].
    Aucamp H; Muller M
    Curationis; 2000 Mar; 23(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 11140024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using Lotus software to calculate faculty merit increases.
    Anema MG; Anema C
    Comput Nurs; 1992; 10(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 1600464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Colombia: evaluation of the masters degree in nursing, Universidad del Valle 1988-1990].
    Aguirre de Cabal B; Barona de Infante N; Castillo E; Granada MV; Lerma J; Tovar MC; Vásquez ML
    Educ Med Salud; 1993; 27(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 8462436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nurse educator performance standards.
    Fitzsimmons B; Piercy J; Noel L; Connolly C
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1996; 12(5):247-51. PubMed ID: 8954402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
    Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
    Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Myths and misconceptions about student ratings of college faculty: separating fact from fiction.
    VanArsdale SK; Hammons JO
    Nurs Outlook; 1995; 43(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 7761282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Student evaluation of teaching: potential and limitations.
    Morton PG
    Nurs Outlook; 1987; 35(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 3644246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Student evaluation--threat or incentive?
    Armington CL; Reinikka EA; Creighton H
    Nurs Outlook; 1972 Dec; 20(12):789-92. PubMed ID: 4484871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Growth and access increase for nursing students: a retention and progression project.
    Valencia-Go G
    J Cult Divers; 2005; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15918249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Faculty role development in university schools of nursing.
    Barley ZA; Redman BK
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 May; 9(5):43-7. PubMed ID: 255145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Associate and assistant deanships in schools of nursing.
    George SA
    Nurs Leadersh; 1981 Sep; 4(3):25-30. PubMed ID: 6912410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Faculty development: not just a bandwagon.
    Hipps OS
    Nurs Outlook; 1978 Nov; 26(11):692-6. PubMed ID: 251238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comprehensive approach to faculty evaluation.
    Boland DL; Sims SL
    J Nurs Educ; 1988 Oct; 27(8):354-8. PubMed ID: 2852225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A faculty growth contracting model for allied health schools.
    Schaffer DR
    J Allied Health; 1980 Nov; 9(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 7462086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.