258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24378337)
1. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
MacDessi SJ; Jang B; Harris IA; Wheatley E; Bryant C; Chen DB
Knee; 2014 Mar; 21(2):406-9. PubMed ID: 24378337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty.
Crane C; Marimuthu K; Chen DB; Harris IA; Wheatley E; MacDessi SJ
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1244-9. PubMed ID: 25218970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Maher PA; Rebolledo BJ; Nawabi DH; McLawhorn AS; Pearle AD
Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 23347791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial.
De Vloo R; Pellikaan P; Dhollander A; Vander Sloten J
Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 28943039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific guides: Is there a learning curve?
Chinnappa J; Chen DB; Harris IA; MacDessi SJ
Knee; 2015 Dec; 22(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 26120064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial.
Schotanus MG; Sollie R; van Haaren EH; Hendrickx RP; Jansen EJ; Kort NP
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jun; 98-B(6):786-92. PubMed ID: 27235521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation improves the accuracy of mechanical alignment and component positioning in total knee arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Goh GS; Pang HN; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1173-80. PubMed ID: 27349233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of the surgical time and coronalmechanical alignment after total knee arthroplasty using computer navigation system, traditionalor 3D printing patient-specific instruments].
Li Y; Tian H; Geng X
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 98(27):2157-2161. PubMed ID: 30032517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial.
Chotanaphuti T; Wangwittayakul V; Khuangsirikul S; Foojareonyos T
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 23999209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative radiologic outcome comparison between conventional and computer-assisted navigation total knee arthroplasty in extra-articular tibia vara.
Cho Y; Shin HK; Kim E; Park JH; Park SJ; Jang T; Jeong HJ
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(1):2309499020905702. PubMed ID: 32114895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Blakeney WG; Khan RJ; Wall SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(15):1377-84. PubMed ID: 21915542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lack of agreement between computer navigation and post-operative 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) measurements for component and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Dahabreh Z; Scholes CJ; Giuffre B; Coolican MR; Parker DA
Knee; 2016 Jan; 23(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 26282326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific instrumentation development in TKA: 1st and 2nd generation designs in comparison with conventional instrumentation.
Kwon OR; Kang KT; Son J; Suh DS; Heo DB; Koh YG
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 28005167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system.
Seo SS; Seo JH; Sohn MW; Kim YJ
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):50-5. PubMed ID: 23026253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of alignment between computer assisted surgery and personal specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty].
Wang XG; Li Y; He YZ; Wu TC; Tian H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 101(47):3850-3856. PubMed ID: 34905884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of alignment and operative time between portable accelerometer-based navigation device and computer assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty].
Wang XG; Geng X; Li Y; Wu TC; Li ZJ; Tian H
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Aug; 53(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 34393236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSIST™ versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary case-control study.
Desseaux A; Graf P; Dubrana F; Marino R; Clavé A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 May; 102(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 27033838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alignment of the lower extremity mechanical axis by computer-aided design and application in total knee arthroplasty.
Zhang YZ; Lu S; Zhang HQ; Jin ZM; Zhao JM; Huang J; Zhang ZF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1881-90. PubMed ID: 27017501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without computer navigation: a bilateral total knee arthroplasty study.
Johnson DR; Dennis DA; Kindsfater KA; Kim RH
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):455-8. PubMed ID: 23164836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
