These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24379696)

  • 21. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.
    Lund I; Lundeberg T; Sandberg L; Budh CN; Kowalski J; Svensson E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16202149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Taira BR; Chohan J; Cardoz H; Chisena E; Thode HC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Jan; 17(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20003121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An application of pain rating scales in geriatric patients.
    Bergh I; Sjöström B; Odén A; Steen B
    Aging (Milano); 2000 Oct; 12(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 11126525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Faces scales for the measurement of postoperative pain intensity in children following minor surgery.
    Chambers CT; Hardial J; Craig KD; Court C; Montgomery C
    Clin J Pain; 2005; 21(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 15818080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective.
    Clark P; Lavielle P; Martínez H
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12858463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Carroll rating scale for depression. III. Comparison with other rating instruments.
    Feinberg M; Carroll BJ; Smouse PE; Rawson SG
    Br J Psychiatry; 1981 Mar; 138():205-9. PubMed ID: 7272611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of the visual analog scale to rate and monitor severity of nausea in the emergency department.
    Meek R; Kelly AM; Hu XF
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1304-1310. PubMed ID: 20053251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers.
    Jamison RN; Gracely RH; Raymond SA; Levine JG; Marino B; Herrmann TJ; Daly M; Fram D; Katz NP
    Pain; 2002 Sep; 99(1-2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12237213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measuring the Intensity of Chronic Pain: Are the Visual Analogue Scale and the Verbal Rating Scale Interchangeable?
    Kliger M; Stahl S; Haddad M; Suzan E; Adler R; Eisenberg E
    Pain Pract; 2015 Jul; 15(6):538-47. PubMed ID: 24735056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Across- and within-session variability of ratings of painful contact heat stimuli.
    Quiton RL; Greenspan JD
    Pain; 2008 Jul; 137(2):245-256. PubMed ID: 17942227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three new datasets supporting use of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) for children's self-reports of pain intensity.
    von Baeyer CL; Spagrud LJ; McCormick JC; Choo E; Neville K; Connelly MA
    Pain; 2009 Jun; 143(3):223-227. PubMed ID: 19359097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales.
    Ferreira-Valente MA; Pais-Ribeiro JL; Jensen MP
    Pain; 2011 Oct; 152(10):2399-2404. PubMed ID: 21856077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability of Untrained and Experienced Raters on FEES: Rating Overall Residue is a Simple Task.
    Pisegna JM; Borders JC; Kaneoka A; Coster WJ; Leonard R; Langmore SE
    Dysphagia; 2018 Oct; 33(5):645-654. PubMed ID: 29516172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How do medical students use and understand pain rating scales?
    Zalmay P; Williams ACC
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Apr; 15():68-72. PubMed ID: 28850349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensitivity of pain rating scales in an endoscopy trial.
    Skovlund E; Bretthauer M; Grotmol T; Larsen IK; Hoff G
    Clin J Pain; 2005; 21(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 15951645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of electronic visual analogue and numerical scales for ratings of experimental pain in healthy subjects and fibromyalgia patients.
    Price DD; Patel R; Robinson ME; Staud R
    Pain; 2008 Nov; 140(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 18786761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What Determines Whether a Pain is Rated as Mild, Moderate, or Severe? The Importance of Pain Beliefs and Pain Interference.
    Jensen MP; Tomé-Pires C; de la Vega R; Galán S; Solé E; Miró J
    Clin J Pain; 2017 May; 33(5):414-421. PubMed ID: 27584819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: Visual Analogue or Verbal Rating Scale?
    Loos MJ; Houterman S; Scheltinga MR; Roumen RM
    Hernia; 2008 Apr; 12(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 18004502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
    Boonstra AM; Schiphorst Preuper HR; Balk GA; Stewart RE
    Pain; 2014 Dec; 155(12):2545-2550. PubMed ID: 25239073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.
    Bijur PE; Latimer CT; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 12670856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.