These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24381734)

  • 1. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation.
    Javed F; Ahmed HB; Crespi R; Romanos GE
    Interv Med Appl Sci; 2013 Dec; 5(4):162-7. PubMed ID: 24381734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review.
    Javed F; Romanos GE
    J Dent; 2010 Aug; 38(8):612-20. PubMed ID: 20546821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Periodic Assessment of Peri-implant Tissue Changes: Imperative for Implant Success.
    Rahman SA; Muhammad H; Haque S; Alam MK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Feb; 20(2):173-178. PubMed ID: 31058631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
    Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can Osseointegration Be Achieved Without Primary Stability?
    Al-Sabbagh M; Eldomiaty W; Khabbaz Y
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):461-473. PubMed ID: 31097138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success.
    Steigenga JT; al-Shammari KF; Nociti FH; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2003; 12(4):306-17. PubMed ID: 14752967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.
    Falco A; Berardini M; Trisi P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):824-830. PubMed ID: 30024998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.
    Meredith N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 9922740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants.
    Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 11885181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants.
    Lioubavina-Hack N; Lang NP; Karring T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 16672018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability and Crestal Bone Behavior Following Simultaneous Placement of Multiple Dental Implants (Two or More) with the Bone Splitting Technique: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation.
    Gehrke SA; Maté Sánchez de Val JE; Ramírez Fernández MP; Shibli JA; Rossetti PH; Calvo Guirado JL
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):123-130. PubMed ID: 27189627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Dental Implant Width and Length Matter?
    Bedrossian E
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020; 41(7):e1-e5. PubMed ID: 32687377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration.
    Le Guéhennec L; Soueidan A; Layrolle P; Amouriq Y
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):844-54. PubMed ID: 16904738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histomorphometric evaluation of implant design as a key factor in peri-implant bone response: a preliminary study in a dog model.
    Orsini E; Salgarello S; Bubalo M; Lazic Z; Trire A; Martini D; Franchi M; Ruggeri A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Jun; 58(6):263-75. PubMed ID: 19516235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period.
    Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Beck F; Leblebicioglu B
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 16018748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of implant design on the kinetics of osseointegration and bone anchorage homeostasis.
    Liddell RS; Ajami E; Li Y; Bajenova E; Yang Y; Davies JE
    Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():514-526. PubMed ID: 33271359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Titanium Dental Implants: A Comparative Systematic Review.
    López-Valverde N; Flores-Fraile J; Ramírez JM; Sousa BM; Herrero-Hernández S; López-Valverde A
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
    Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part I: immediate loading considered in light of the original prerequisites for osseointegration.
    Bahat O; Sullivan RM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e2-12. PubMed ID: 20455902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone density: its influence on implant stability after uncovering.
    Morris HE; Ochi S; Crum P; Orenstein I; Plezia R
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(6):263-9. PubMed ID: 14719574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.