These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Paradoxical Hyperplasia Post Cryolipolysis and Management. Karcher C; Katz B; Sadick N Dermatol Surg; 2017 Mar; 43(3):467-470. PubMed ID: 28267702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Enhancing the Appearance of the "Six-Pack" Muscles Using Cryolipolysis: A Safe and Effective Method. Lim T; Ding SW; Chua CH; Moey HX Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Oct; 148(4):775-779. PubMed ID: 34550933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Noninvasive selective cryolipolysis and reperfusion recovery for localized natural fat reduction and contouring. Sasaki GH; Abelev N; Tevez-Ortiz A Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Mar; 34(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 24598865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Multicenter Evaluation of Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia Following Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction and Body Contouring: A Review of 8658 Cycles in 2114 Patients. Nikolis A; Enright KM Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jul; 41(8):932-941. PubMed ID: 33216910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40% reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference. Kilmer SL Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jan; 49(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27327898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomized double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of topical body treatment with TriHex Technology Moradi A; Poehler J; Bell M J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Mar; 19(3):677-681. PubMed ID: 32009299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Commentary on: A Multicenter Evaluation of Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia Following Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction and Body Contouring: A Review of 8658 Cycles in 2114 Patients. Stefani WA Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jul; 41(8):942-943. PubMed ID: 33956082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of research for a cryolipolysis technology. Gold MH; Vargas Lamas RE J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():25-30. PubMed ID: 37988713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment after cryolipolysis may be used to reduce pain: Two case report. Ko EJ; Kwon HJ; Kwon TR; Choi SY; Yoo KH; Kim BJ Dermatol Ther; 2018 Jul; 31(4):e12604. PubMed ID: 29644788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia After Cryoadipolysis Refractory to Tumescent Liposuction. Friedmann DP; Buckley S; Mishra V Dermatol Surg; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1103-1105. PubMed ID: 28471787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cryolipolysis versus laser lipolysis on adolescent abdominal adiposity. Mostafa MS; Elshafey MA Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 26791606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved methods for selective cryolipolysis results in subcutaneous fat layer reduction in a porcine model. Kwon TR; Yoo KH; Oh CT; Shin DH; Choi EJ; Jung SJ; Hong H; Choi YS; Kim BJ Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25220194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Broad overview of a clinical and commercial experience with CoolSculpting. Stevens WG; Pietrzak LK; Spring MA Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Aug; 33(6):835-46. PubMed ID: 23858510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cryolipolysis in the United States-Review of the clinical data. Hetzel J; Awad N; Bhupalam V; Nestor M J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():8-14. PubMed ID: 37988714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]