163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24383119)
1. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale does not reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke versus medical therapy alone: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhang B; Zhou J; Li H; Zhou M; Chen A; Zhao Q
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 169(6):e106-8. PubMed ID: 24383119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Device closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Khan AR; Bin Abdulhak AA; Sheikh MA; Khan S; Erwin PJ; Tleyjeh I; Khuder S; Eltahawy EA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1316-23. PubMed ID: 24139929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patent foramen ovale transcatheter closure vs. medical therapy on recurrent vascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Rengifo-Moreno P; Palacios IF; Junpaparp P; Witzke CF; Morris DL; Romero-Corral A
Eur Heart J; 2013 Nov; 34(43):3342-52. PubMed ID: 23847132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Case for Selective Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Cryptogenic Stroke.
Wiktor DM; Carroll JD
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e004152. PubMed ID: 29870380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy in Cryptogenic Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Vidale S; Russo F; Campana C; Agostoni E
Angiology; 2019 Apr; 70(4):325-331. PubMed ID: 30270651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Darmoch F; Al-Khadra Y; Soud M; Fanari Z; Alraies MC
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018; 45(3-4):162-169. PubMed ID: 29597192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke: A Topical Review.
Saver JL; Mattle HP; Thaler D
Stroke; 2018 Jun; 49(6):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 29760277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with prior cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Akobeng AK; Abdelgadir I; Boudjemline Y; Hijazi ZM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):165-173. PubMed ID: 29602258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of recurrent events in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale within the CLOSURE I (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a Patent Foramen Ovale) trial.
Elmariah S; Furlan AJ; Reisman M; Burke D; Vardi M; Wimmer NJ; Ling S; Chen X; Kent DM; Massaro J; Mauri L;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):913-20. PubMed ID: 25147037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-analysis of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events.
Pineda AM; Nascimento FO; Yang SC; Kirtane AJ; Sommer RJ; Beohar N
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 23832613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patent foramen ovale closure with GORE HELEX or CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder vs. antiplatelet therapy for reduction of recurrent stroke or new brain infarct in patients with prior cryptogenic stroke: Design of the randomized Gore REDUCE Clinical Study.
Kasner SE; Thomassen L; Søndergaard L; Rhodes JF; Larsen CC; Jacobson J
Int J Stroke; 2017 Dec; 12(9):998-1004. PubMed ID: 29090661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recurrent cerebral ischemia in medically treated patent foramen ovale: a meta-analysis.
Almekhlafi MA; Wilton SB; Rabi DM; Ghali WA; Lorenzetti DL; Hill MD
Neurology; 2009 Jul; 73(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 19439720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Schulze V; Lin Y; Karathanos A; Brockmeyer M; Zeus T; Polzin A; Perings S; Kelm M; Wolff G
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):745-755. PubMed ID: 29500568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Abdelaziz HK; Saad M; Abuomara HZ; Nairooz R; Pothineni NVK; Madmani ME; Roberts DH; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):176-186. PubMed ID: 29726616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduced Stroke After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Alvarez C; Siddiqui WJ; Aggarwal S; Hasni SF; Hankins S; Eisen H
Am J Med Sci; 2018 Aug; 356(2):103-113. PubMed ID: 30219151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure versus standard medical therapy for prevention of recurrent stroke: Updated Meta-analysis with an importance on shunt size.
Patel K; Doshi R; Goyal H; Shah P; Meraj P
Eur J Intern Med; 2018 Nov; 57():e31-e33. PubMed ID: 30146180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: the hole story.
Furlan AJ; Jauss M
Stroke; 2013 Sep; 44(9):2676-8. PubMed ID: 23908069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is transcatheter closure better than medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale? A meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Nagaraja V; Raval J; Eslick GD; Burgess D; Denniss AR
Heart Lung Circ; 2013 Nov; 22(11):903-9. PubMed ID: 24035325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.
Wang TKM; Wang MTM; Ruygrok P
Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):623-631. PubMed ID: 29602754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity Score-Based Analysis of Percutaneous Closure Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale: The IPSYS Registry (Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults).
Pezzini A; Grassi M; Lodigiani C; Patella R; Gandolfo C; Zini A; DeLodovici ML; Paciaroni M; Del Sette M; Toriello A; Musolino R; Calabrò RS; Bovi P; Adami A; Silvestrelli G; Sessa M; Cavallini A; Marcheselli S; Marco Bonifati D; Checcarelli N; Tancredi L; Chiti A; Del Zotto E; Tomelleri G; Spalloni A; Giorli E; Costa P; Giacalone G; Ferrazzi P; Poli L; Morotti A; Piras V; Rasura M; Simone AM; Gamba M; Cerrato P; Zedde ML; Micieli G; Melis M; Massucco D; Guido D; De Giuli V; Bonaiti S; D'Amore C; La Starza S; Iacoviello L; Padovani A;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27582111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
