190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24386102)
1. Evaluation of mitotic activity index in breast cancer using whole slide digital images.
Al-Janabi S; van Slooten HJ; Visser M; van der Ploeg T; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82576. PubMed ID: 24386102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer histologic grading using digital microscopy: concordance and outcome association.
Rakha EA; Aleskandarani M; Toss MS; Green AR; Ball G; Ellis IO; Dalton LW
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Aug; 71(8):680-686. PubMed ID: 29535212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual assessment of mitotic figures in breast cancer: a comparative study between light microscopy and whole slide images.
Lashen A; Ibrahim A; Katayama A; Ball G; Mihai R; Toss M; Rakha E
Histopathology; 2021 Dec; 79(6):913-925. PubMed ID: 34455620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of tumour proliferation by use of the mitotic activity index, and Ki67 and phosphohistone H3 expression, in early-stage luminal breast cancer.
van Steenhoven JEC; Kuijer A; Kornegoor R; van Leeuwen G; van Gorp J; van Dalen T; van Diest PJ
Histopathology; 2020 Oct; 77(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 32557844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial Intelligence-Based Mitosis Scoring in Breast Cancer: Clinical Application.
Ibrahim A; Jahanifar M; Wahab N; Toss MS; Makhlouf S; Atallah N; Lashen AG; Katayama A; Graham S; Bilal M; Bhalerao A; Ahmed Raza SE; Snead D; Minhas F; Rajpoot N; Rakha E
Mod Pathol; 2024 Mar; 37(3):100416. PubMed ID: 38154653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep learning supported mitoses counting on whole slide images: A pilot study for validating breast cancer grading in the clinical workflow.
van Bergeijk SA; Stathonikos N; Ter Hoeve ND; Lafarge MW; Nguyen TQ; van Diest PJ; Veta M
J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100316. PubMed ID: 37273455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Computational Detection, Quantitation, and Mapping of Mitosis in Whole-Slide Images for Clinically Actionable Surgical Pathology Decision Support.
Puri M; Hoover SB; Hewitt SM; Wei BR; Adissu HA; Halsey CHC; Beck J; Bradley C; Cramer SD; Durham AC; Esplin DG; Frank C; Lyle LT; McGill LD; Sánchez MD; Schaffer PA; Traslavina RP; Buza E; Yang HH; Lee MP; Dwyer JE; Simpson RM
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():4. PubMed ID: 30915258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer.
Balkenhol MCA; Tellez D; Vreuls W; Clahsen PC; Pinckaers H; Ciompi F; Bult P; van der Laak JAWM
Lab Invest; 2019 Nov; 99(11):1596-1606. PubMed ID: 31222166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining the area of mitoses counting in invasive breast cancer using whole slide image.
Ibrahim A; Lashen AG; Katayama A; Mihai R; Ball G; Toss MS; Rakha EA
Mod Pathol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):739-748. PubMed ID: 34897279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of mitotic cell quantification via microscopy and multiple whole-slide scanners.
Tabata K; Uraoka N; Benhamida J; Hanna MG; Sirintrapun SJ; Gallas BD; Gong Q; Aly RG; Emoto K; Matsuda KM; Hameed MR; Klimstra DS; Yagi Y
Diagn Pathol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 31238983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the prognostic value of four methods to assess mitotic activity in 186 invasive breast cancer patients: classical and random mitotic activity assessments with correction for volume percentage of epithelium.
Jannink I; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Hum Pathol; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1086-92. PubMed ID: 7557941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The histopathological diagnosis of atypical meningioma: glass slide versus whole slide imaging for grading assessment.
Ammendola S; Bariani E; Eccher A; Capitanio A; Ghimenton C; Pantanowitz L; Parwani A; Girolami I; Scarpa A; Barresi V
Virchows Arch; 2021 Apr; 478(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 33305338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images.
Veta M; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Wang H; Madabhushi A; Cruz-Roa A; Gonzalez F; Larsen AB; Vestergaard JS; Dahl AB; Cireşan DC; Schmidhuber J; Giusti A; Gambardella LM; Tek FB; Walter T; Wang CW; Kondo S; Matuszewski BJ; Precioso F; Snell V; Kittler J; de Campos TE; Khan AM; Rajpoot NM; Arkoumani E; Lacle MM; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
Med Image Anal; 2015 Feb; 20(1):237-48. PubMed ID: 25547073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.
Araújo ALD; Arboleda LPA; Palmier NR; Fonsêca JM; de Pauli Paglioni M; Gomes-Silva W; Ribeiro ACP; Brandão TB; Simonato LE; Speight PM; Fonseca FP; Lopes MA; de Almeida OP; Vargas PA; Madrid Troconis CC; Santos-Silva AR
Virchows Arch; 2019 Mar; 474(3):269-287. PubMed ID: 30685784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses.
Pantanowitz L; Hartman D; Qi Y; Cho EY; Suh B; Paeng K; Dhir R; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Song SY; Cho SY
Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 32622359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. WSI validation studies in breast and gynecological pathology.
Mastrosimini MG; Eccher A; Nottegar A; Montin U; Scarpa A; Pantanowitz L; Girolami I
Pathol Res Pract; 2022 Dec; 240():154191. PubMed ID: 36356336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Counting Mitoses With Digital Pathology in Breast Phyllodes Tumors.
Chow ZL; Thike AA; Li HH; Nasir NDM; Yeong JPS; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Nov; 144(11):1397-1400. PubMed ID: 32150458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement in Histological Assessment of Mitotic Activity Between Microscopy and Digital Whole Slide Images Informs Conversion for Clinical Diagnosis.
Wei BR; Halsey CH; Hoover SB; Puri M; Yang HH; Gallas BD; Lee MP; Chen W; Durham AC; Dwyer JE; Sánchez MD; Traslavina RP; Frank C; Bradley C; McGill LD; Esplin DG; Schaffer PA; Cramer SD; Lyle LT; Beck J; Buza E; Gong Q; Hewitt SM; Simpson RM
Acad Pathol; 2019; 6():2374289519859841. PubMed ID: 31321298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A deep learning based strategy for identifying and associating mitotic activity with gene expression derived risk categories in estrogen receptor positive breast cancers.
Romo-Bucheli D; Janowczyk A; Gilmore H; Romero E; Madabhushi A
Cytometry A; 2017 Jun; 91(6):566-573. PubMed ID: 28192639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
