These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24386103)

  • 1. Results on three predictions for July 2012 federal elections in Mexico based on past regularities.
    Hernández-Saldaña H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82584. PubMed ID: 24386103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations.
    Jimenez R; Hidalgo M; Klimek P
    Sci Adv; 2017 Jun; 3(6):e1602363. PubMed ID: 28695193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.
    Jiménez R; Hidalgo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100884. PubMed ID: 24971462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The (un)making of electoral transparency through technology: The 2017 Kenyan presidential election controversy.
    Passanti C; Pommerolle ME
    Soc Stud Sci; 2022 Dec; 52(6):928-953. PubMed ID: 36154350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weather conditions and political party vote share in Dutch national parliament elections, 1971-2010.
    Eisinga R; Te Grotenhuis M; Pelzer B
    Int J Biometeorol; 2012 Nov; 56(6):1161-5. PubMed ID: 22065127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities on their experience of voting in UK general elections.
    Manktelow N; Chadwick DD; Brewster S; Tilly L
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2023 May; 36(3):629-640. PubMed ID: 36918746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viewing the US presidential electoral map through the lens of public health.
    Hamamsy T; Danziger M; Nagler J; Bonneau R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254001. PubMed ID: 34288913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?
    Beall AT; Hofer MK; Schaller M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 26976083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities.
    Klimek P; Yegorov Y; Hanel R; Thurner S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(41):16469-73. PubMed ID: 23010929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voting by People with Mental Illness.
    Okwerekwu JA; McKenzie JB; Yates KA; Sorrentino RM; Friedman SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Dec; 46(4):513-520. PubMed ID: 30381392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The forensics of fraud: Evidence from the 2018 Brazilian presidential election.
    Figueiredo Filho D; Silva L; Carvalho E
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100286. PubMed ID: 36176631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moral Foundations and Voting Intention in Italy.
    Milesi P
    Eur J Psychol; 2017 Nov; 13(4):667-687. PubMed ID: 29358981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017-2018.
    Klimek P; Jiménez R; Hidalgo M; Hinteregger A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204975. PubMed ID: 30289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
    Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not every dissatisfaction is the same: The impact of electoral regret, disappointment, and anger on subsequent electoral behavior.
    Tunç MN; Brandt MJ; Zeelenberg M
    Emotion; 2023 Mar; 23(2):554-568. PubMed ID: 35446054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electoral demography. The demographic dimension of a political process].
    Herrero JM
    Demos; 1991; (4):36-7. PubMed ID: 12158046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.