These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24386719)

  • 1. Retention of gap length in normal-hearing listeners.
    Ries DT; Woods A; Smith M
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):994-7. PubMed ID: 24386719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Release from retroactive retention interference for acoustic duration.
    Ries DT; Gadd D; Smith M
    Perception; 2014; 43(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 25109012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory N1 component to gaps in continuous narrowband noises.
    Atcherson SR; Gould HJ; Mendel MI; Ethington CA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):687-95. PubMed ID: 19675460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparation of stimuli for timbre perception studies.
    Labuschagne IB; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2256-67. PubMed ID: 23967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gap detection and temporal modulation transfer function as behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity using band-limited stimuli in young and older adults.
    Shen Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2280-92. PubMed ID: 25087722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of noise vocoding on gap detection thresholds.
    Zhang F; Blankenship C; Xiang J; Houston L; Samy R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 25941867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners.
    Phillips DP; Smith JC
    Perception; 2004; 33(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 15176620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Akeroyd MA; Hartung K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1604-15. PubMed ID: 11325131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
    Lister J; Tarver K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory temporal processing in Parkinson's disease.
    Guehl D; Burbaud P; Lorenzi C; Ramos C; Bioulac B; Semal C; Demany L
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2326-35. PubMed ID: 18439632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory temporal gap detection in children with and without auditory processing disorder.
    Phillips DP; Comeau M; Andrus JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):404-8. PubMed ID: 20701837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Role of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure in Mandarin Lexical Tone Perception in Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Wang S; Dong R; Liu D; Wang Y; Liu B; Zhang L; Xu L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129710. PubMed ID: 26052707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory temporal resolution in children assessed by magnetoencephalography.
    Diedler J; Pietz J; Bast T; Rupp A
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1691-5. PubMed ID: 17921870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of stimulus type and frequency.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15072523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related differences in discrimination of an interval separating onsets of successive tone bursts as a function of interval duration.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S; Barrett J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):458-66. PubMed ID: 17614503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiotactile temporal order judgments.
    Zampini M; Brown T; Shore DI; Maravita A; Röder B; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 15698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive tests of temporal resolution: comparison with the gaps-in-noise test in normal-hearing young adults.
    Wong AC; McPherson B
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25517630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.