178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24389134)
1. Prostate MRI: access to and current practice of prostate MRI in the United States.
Leake JL; Hardman R; Ojili V; Thompson I; Shanbhogue A; Hernandez J; Barentsz J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24389134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.
Chang SD; Margolis DJA; Turkbey B; Arnold AA; Verma S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):952-959. PubMed ID: 33566638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy.
Muthigi A; Sidana A; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Maruf M; Valayil S; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):32.e1-32.e7. PubMed ID: 27743850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current practice and access to prostate MR imaging in France.
Renard-Penna R; Rouvière O; Puech P; Borgogno C; Abbas L; Roy C; Claudon M; Correas JM; Cormier L; Ploussard G; Mejean A; Tezenas-du-Montcel S; Rozet F
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Nov; 97(11):1125-1129. PubMed ID: 27451262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI of the Prostate in Germany: Online Survey among Radiologists.
Mueller-Lisse UG; Lewerich B; Mueller-Lisse UL; Reiser M; Scherr MK
Rofo; 2015 Aug; 187(8):703-11. PubMed ID: 26069149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thirty-two-channel coil 3T magnetic resonance-guided biopsies of prostate tumor suspicious regions identified on multimodality 3T magnetic resonance imaging: technique and feasibility.
Hambrock T; Fütterer JJ; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-vandeKaa C; van Basten JP; van Oort I; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct; 43(10):686-94. PubMed ID: 18791410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate MRI: a national survey of Urologist's attitudes and perceptions.
Manley BJ; Brockman JA; Raup VT; Fowler KJ; Andriole GL
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 27286108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of the prostate at 3.0T with external phased array coil - preliminary results.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Bastian PJ; Gieseke J; Träber F; Kuhl CK; Wattjes MP; Müller SC; Schild HH
Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jun; 13(6):287-91. PubMed ID: 18558555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Using Endorectal Coil MRI at 3 T: Addition of DWI and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement to T2-Weighted MRI.
Kitajima K; Hartman RP; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 26397329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on cancer detection and treatment patterns.
Liu W; Patil D; Howard DH; Moore RH; Wang H; Sanda MG; Filson CP
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e15-181.e21. PubMed ID: 30514604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for prostate cancer detection.
Perdonà S; Di Lorenzo G; Autorino R; Buonerba C; De Sio M; Setola SV; Fusco R; Ronza FM; Caraglia M; Ferro M; Petrillo A
Urol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(6):761-5. PubMed ID: 21906966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current utilization and procedural practices in pediatric whole-body MRI.
Schooler GR; Davis JT; Daldrup-Link HE; Frush DP
Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):1101-1107. PubMed ID: 29721598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to monitor the prostate for residual disease or local cancer recurrence after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; D'Urso L; Dellamonica P; Illing R; Regge D; Muto G
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 18476973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in oncology: an Italian survey.
Albano D; Stecco A; Micci G; Sconfienza LM; Colagrande S; Reginelli A; Grassi R; Carriero A; Midiri M; Lagalla R; Galia M
Radiol Med; 2021 Feb; 126(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 32572763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer: a national survey of patterns of practice among radiation oncologists in Spain.
Couñago F; Sancho G; Gómez-Iturriaga A; Henríquez I;
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1484-1491. PubMed ID: 29992463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of endorectal coil versus body coil MRI for diagnosis of recurrent pelvic malignancies.
Huch Böni RA; Meyenberger C; Pok Lundquist J; Trinkler F; Lütolf U; Krestin GP
Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 8661581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Comparison with histologic macrosections in 40 cases].
Torricelli P; Iadanza M; De Santis M; Pollastri CA; Cesinaro AM; Trentini G; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 10478207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
