128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24389336)
1. Structural finite element analysis to explain cell mechanics variability.
Barreto S; Perrault CM; Lacroix D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Oct; 38():219-31. PubMed ID: 24389336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Finite Element Bendo-Tensegrity Model of Eukaryotic Cell.
Bansod YD; Matsumoto T; Nagayama K; Bursa J
J Biomech Eng; 2018 Oct; 140(10):. PubMed ID: 30029237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Material modeling of biofilm mechanical properties.
Laspidou CS; Spyrou LA; Aravas N; Rittmann BE
Math Biosci; 2014 May; 251():11-5. PubMed ID: 24560820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of boundary conditions and loading mode on high-resolution finite element-computed trabecular tissue properties.
Bevill G; Eswaran SK; Farahmand F; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2009 Apr; 44(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 19110082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A parametric study of hard tissue injury prediction using finite elements: consideration of geometric complexity, subfailure material properties, CT-thresholding, and element characteristics.
Arregui-Dalmases C; Del Pozo E; Duprey S; Lopez-Valdes FJ; Lau A; Subit D; Kent R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 20544573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-structural single cell model of force-induced interactions of cytoskeletal components.
Barreto S; Clausen CH; Perrault CM; Fletcher DA; Lacroix D
Biomaterials; 2013 Aug; 34(26):6119-26. PubMed ID: 23702149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of indentation of a sample equine bone using finite element simulation and single cycle reference point indentation.
Hoffseth K; Randall C; Hansma P; Yang HT
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():282-91. PubMed ID: 25528690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A finite element model of cell-matrix interactions to study the differential effect of scaffold composition on chondrogenic response to mechanical stimulation.
Appelman TP; Mizrahi J; Seliktar D
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):041010. PubMed ID: 21428684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical properties of monolayer graphene oxide.
Suk JW; Piner RD; An J; Ruoff RS
ACS Nano; 2010 Nov; 4(11):6557-64. PubMed ID: 20942443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient-specific computer tomography-based finite element methodology to calculate the six dimensional stiffness matrix of human vertebral bodies.
Chevalier Y; Zysset PK
J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051006. PubMed ID: 22757494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Numerical evaluation of bulk material properties of dental composites using two-phase finite element models.
Li J; Li H; Fok AS; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):996-1003. PubMed ID: 22727356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of material properties and porosity of bone on mechanical response of articular cartilage in human knee joint--a two-dimensional finite element study.
Venäläinen MS; Mononen ME; Jurvelin JS; Töyräs J; Virén T; Korhonen RK
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Dec; 136(12):121005. PubMed ID: 25322202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer cell mechanics with altered cytoskeletal behavior and substrate effects: A 3D finite element modeling study.
Katti DR; Katti KS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Dec; 76():125-134. PubMed ID: 28571747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of the Young's modulus of the primary plant cell wall using Bending-Lab-On-Chip (BLOC).
Nezhad AS; Naghavi M; Packirisamy M; Bhat R; Geitmann A
Lab Chip; 2013 Jul; 13(13):2599-608. PubMed ID: 23571308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mechanistic insight into the mechanical role of the stratum corneum during stretching and compression of the skin.
Leyva-Mendivil MF; Page A; Bressloff NW; Limbert G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Sep; 49():197-219. PubMed ID: 26042766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion.
Kamgoué A; Ohayon J; Tracqui P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 17655473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the ovine intervertebral disc a small human one? A finite element model study.
Schmidt H; Reitmaier S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jan; 17():229-41. PubMed ID: 23127644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell.
McGarry JG; Prendergast PJ
Eur Cell Mater; 2004 Apr; 7():27-33; discussion 33-4. PubMed ID: 15095253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of intrinsic damage properties to bone fragility: a finite element study.
Hardisty MR; Zauel R; Stover SM; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Jan; 135(1):011004. PubMed ID: 23363215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
