BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24389906)

  • 1. Best single time point correlations with AUC for cyclosporine and tacrolimus in HIV-infected kidney and liver transplant recipients.
    Frassetto LA; Tan-Tam CC; Barin B; Browne M; Wolfe AR; Stock PG; Roland M; Benet LZ
    Transplantation; 2014 Mar; 97(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 24389906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best single time points to predict the area-under-the-curve in long-term heart transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
    Mardigyan V; Giannetti N; Cecere R; Besner JG; Cantarovich M
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1614-8. PubMed ID: 16210138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Best single time points as surrogates to the tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid area under the curve in adult liver transplant patients beyond 12 months of transplantation.
    Mardigyan V; Tchervenkov J; Metrakos P; Barkun J; Deschenes M; Cantarovich M
    Clin Ther; 2005 Apr; 27(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 15922819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in clearance, volume and bioavailability of immunosuppressants when given with HAART in HIV-1 infected liver and kidney transplant recipients.
    Frassetto L; Floren L; Barin B; Browne M; Wolfe A; Roland M; Stock P; Carlson L; Christians U; Benet L
    Biopharm Drug Dispos; 2013 Nov; 34(8):442-51. PubMed ID: 24030928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative clinical trial of the variability factors of the exposure indices used for the drug monitoring of two tacrolimus formulations in kidney transplant recipients.
    Marquet P; Albano L; Woillard JB; Rostaing L; Kamar N; Sakarovitch C; Gatault P; Buchler M; Charpentier B; Thervet E; Cassuto E
    Pharmacol Res; 2018 Mar; 129():84-94. PubMed ID: 29229354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyclosporine monitoring with 2-hour postdose levels in heart transplant recipients.
    Solari SG; Goldberg LR; DeNofrio D; Shaw LM
    Ther Drug Monit; 2005 Aug; 27(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 16044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized, international study of cyclosporine microemulsion absorption profiling in renal transplantation with basiliximab immunoprophylaxis.
    Internation Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group
    Am J Transplant; 2002 Feb; 2(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 12099518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorption profiling of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) during the first 2 weeks after renal transplantation.
    Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group
    Transplantation; 2001 Sep; 72(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 11579295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of microemulsion cyclosporine A in renal transplantation.
    Bunnag S; Vareesangthip K; Ong-ajyooth L
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89 Suppl 2():S228-34. PubMed ID: 17044476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.
    Shenoy S; Hardinger KL; Crippin J; Korenblat K; Lisker-Melman M; Lowell JA; Chapman W
    Liver Transpl; 2008 Feb; 14(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 18236391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of C2 monitoring to avoid acute rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Schubert S; Abdul-Khaliq H; Lehmkuhl HB; Hübler M; Abd El Rahman MY; Miera O; Ewert P; Weng Y; Wei H; Krüdewagen B; Hetzer R; Berger F
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Jun; 25(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 16730566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between cyclosporine concentrations at 2 hours post-dose and clinical outcomes in de novo lung transplant recipients.
    Akhlaghi F; Gonzalez L; Trull AK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 16364860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender-dependent predictable pharmacokinetic method for tacrolimus exposure monitoring in kidney transplant patients.
    Velickovic-Radovanovic R; Mikov M; Catic-Djordjevic A; Stefanovic N; Mitic B; Paunovic G; Cvetkovic T
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2015 Mar; 40(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 24596067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of trough, 2-hour, and limited AUC blood sampling for monitoring cyclosporin (Neoral) at day 7 post-renal transplantation and incidence of rejection in the first month.
    Morris RG; Russ GR; Cervelli MJ; Juneja R; McDonald SP; Mathew TH
    Ther Drug Monit; 2002 Aug; 24(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 12142630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of changing from cyclosporine C0 to C2 monitoring in stable recipients following renal transplantation: a prospective cohort study.
    Zhang Y; Zhang XD; Wang Y
    Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3697-701. PubMed ID: 22172829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of CYP3A, PPARA, and POR genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.
    Lunde I; Bremer S; Midtvedt K; Mohebi B; Dahl M; Bergan S; Åsberg A; Christensen H
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Jun; 70(6):685-93. PubMed ID: 24658827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
    Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lessons from routine dose adjustment of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients based on global exposure.
    Saint-Marcoux F; Woillard JB; Jurado C; Marquet P
    Ther Drug Monit; 2013 Jun; 35(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 23666572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations 2 hours post-dose determined using 3 different methods and trough level in pediatric renal transplantation.
    Rodríguez E; Delucchi MA; Cano F; Valdebenito S; Castillo MC; Villegas R
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3354-7. PubMed ID: 16298594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation.
    Mahalati K; Belitsky P; Sketris I; West K; Panek R
    Transplantation; 1999 Jul; 68(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10428267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.