These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24390294)

  • 1. Validation of oscillometric pulse wave analysis measurements in children.
    Stoner L; Lambrick DM; Westrupp N; Young J; Faulkner J
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Jun; 27(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 24390294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 24-h ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study.
    Luzardo L; Lujambio I; Sottolano M; da Rosa A; Thijs L; Noboa O; Staessen JA; Boggia J
    Hypertens Res; 2012 Oct; 35(10):980-7. PubMed ID: 22622282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oscillometry and applanation tonometry measurements in older individuals with elevated levels of arterial stiffness.
    van Dijk SC; Enneman AW; Swart KM; van Schoor NM; Uitterlinden AG; Smulders YM; van den Meiracker AH; van der Velde N; Mattace-Raso FU
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Dec; 18(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 24192847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inaccuracy in determining mean arterial pressure with oscillometric blood pressure techniques.
    Vos J; Vincent HH; Verhaar MC; Bos WJ
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 May; 26(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 23547036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of oscillometric central blood pressure and central systolic loading in individuals over 50 years: Effects of posture and fasting.
    Mitchelmore A; Stoner L; Lambrick D; Jobson S; Faulkner J
    Atherosclerosis; 2018 Feb; 269():79-85. PubMed ID: 29339276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: a population-based study.
    Del Giorno R; Troiani C; Gabutti S; Stefanelli K; Gabutti L
    Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 32729734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method.
    Endes S; Bachler M; Li Y; Mayer C; Hanssen H; Hametner B; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Wassertheurer S
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of oscillometric central hemodynamic responses to an orthostatic challenge.
    Stoner L; Bonner C; Credeur D; Lambrick D; Faulkner J; Wadsworth D; Williams MA
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Aug; 241(2):761-5. PubMed ID: 26142686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of oscillometric central blood pressure responses to lower limb resistance exercise.
    Fryer S; Stone K; Dickson T; Faulkner J; Lambrick D; Corres P; Jerred L; Stoner L
    Atherosclerosis; 2018 Jan; 268():157-162. PubMed ID: 29227869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of Central and Peripheral Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Variables Using an Oscillometric Method.
    Echeverri D; Pizano A; Cabrales J; Moreno K
    High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev; 2018 Mar; 25(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 29081017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study.
    Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Considerations for SphygmoCor radial artery pulse wave analysis: side selection and peripheral arterial blood pressure calibration.
    Martin JS; Borges AR; Christy JB; Beck DT
    Hypertens Res; 2015 Oct; 38(10):675-83. PubMed ID: 25787040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric reference values of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity determined with an oscillometric device.
    Fischer DC; Schreiver C; Heimhalt M; Noerenberg A; Haffner D
    J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 30(11):2159-67. PubMed ID: 22940681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ambulatory tonometric blood pressure measurements in patients with diabetes.
    Theilade S; Joergensen C; Persson F; Lajer M; Rossing P
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):453-6. PubMed ID: 22524631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coefficient-free blood pressure estimation based on pulse transit time-cuff pressure dependence.
    Forouzanfar M; Ahmad S; Batkin I; Dajani HR; Groza VZ; Bolic M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1814-24. PubMed ID: 23372068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.