133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24391224)
1. Pattern of breast diseases in Accra: review of mammography reports.
Brakohiapa EK; Armah GE; Clegg-Lamptey JN; Brakohiapa WO
Ghana Med J; 2013 Sep; 47(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 24391224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does breast screening offer a survival benefit? A retrospective comparative study of oncological outcomes of screen-detected and symptomatic early stage breast cancer cases.
Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Udvarhelyi N; Bak M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1814-1820. PubMed ID: 27424787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment.
Apffelstaedt SP; Dalmayer L; Baatjes K
S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 25118556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of mammographic screening on the surgical management of breast cancer.
James TA; Wade JE; Sprague BL
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 113(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 26799535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiologic Findings of a Rare Subtype of Invasive Breast Cancer with Poor Prognosis: Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast.
Aydin H; Guner B; Bostanci IE; Ciledag N; Bulut MB; Bozgul M; Dilek GB; Aribas BK
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 31989886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Liberman L; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Samli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 9016233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma.
Fondrinier E; Lorimier G; Guerin-Boblet V; Bertrand AF; Mayras C; Dauver N
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 11865363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypes.
Kim MY; Kim HS; Choi N; Yang JH; Yoo YB; Park KS
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 26259866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of breast cancer and estimates of overdiagnosis after the initiation of a population-based mammography screening program.
Coldman A; Phillips N
CMAJ; 2013 Jul; 185(10):E492-8. PubMed ID: 23754101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of appropriate short-term mammographic surveillance in patients who undergo breast-conserving Surgery (BCS).
Gunia SR; Merrigan TL; Poulton TB; Mamounas EP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3139-43. PubMed ID: 22872291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dilated duct pattern at mammography.
Huynh PT; Parellada JA; de Paredes ES; Harvey J; Smith D; Holley L; Maxin M
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 9205235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation.
Evans AJ; Pinder S; Ellis IO; Sibbering M; Elston CW; Poller DN; Wilson R
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):237-40. PubMed ID: 8134579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features?
Shi B; Grimm LJ; Mazurowski MA; Baker JA; Marks JR; King LM; Maley CC; Hwang ES; Lo JY
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 28506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography Trends in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal.
Jha A; Chaudhary RK
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2021 Jan; 18(4):667-671. PubMed ID: 33510507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications?
Neal CH; Coletti MC; Joe A; Jeffries DO; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1148-54. PubMed ID: 24147490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme.
Keavey E; Phelan N; O'Connell AM; Flanagan F; O'Doherty A; Larke A; Connors AM
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1123-7. PubMed ID: 22096222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
