BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24392482)

  • 1. The influence of tightening sequence and method on screw preload in implant superstructures.
    Al-Sahan MM; Al Maflehi NS; Akeel RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 24392482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions.
    Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 24423456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
    Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of 3 torque delivery systems on gold screw preload at the gold cylinder-abutment screw joint.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11958399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of abutment screw preload on stress distribution in marginal bone.
    Khraisat A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 22442768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
    Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the coefficient of friction and tightening speed on the preload induced at the dental implant complex with the finite element method.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Geramipanah F; Safari H; Paknejad M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 25749081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Screw Configuration on the Preload Force of Implant-Abutment Screws.
    Zipprich H; Rathe F; Pinz S; Schlotmann L; Lauer HC; Ratka C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):e25-e32. PubMed ID: 29534122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic fatigue performance of implant-abutment assemblies with different tightening torque values.
    Xia D; Lin H; Yuan S; Bai W; Zheng G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2143-9. PubMed ID: 25226912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
    Duyck J; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening/untightening sequences.
    Bernardes SR; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M; Hobkirk J; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 24451858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant.
    Jörn D; Kohorst P; Besdo S; Rücker M; Stiesch M; Borchers L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 24529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.