113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24392482)
21. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of two torque values on the screw preload of implant-supported prostheses with passive fit or misfit.
Al-Otaibi HN; Akeel RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 25216130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11458260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of repeated screw joint closing and opening cycles on implant prosthetic screw reverse torque and implant and screw thread morphology.
Guzaitis KL; Knoernschild KL; Viana MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):159-69. PubMed ID: 21889002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of the use of a counter-torque device on the abutment-implant complex.
Lang LA; May KB; Wang RF
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 81(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 10095210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses.
Siamos G; Winkler S; Boberick KG
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 12498448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Influence of Torque Tightening on the Position Stability of the Abutment in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections.
Hogg WS; Zulauf K; Mehrhof J; Nelson K
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):538-41. PubMed ID: 26340017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
