These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24392482)

  • 41. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
    Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dynamic nature of abutment screw retightening: finite element study of the effect of retightening on the settling effect.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 25749092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study.
    Cardoso M; Torres MF; Lourenço EJ; de Moraes Telles D; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 21457352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A new retrieval system for cement-retained implant superstructures: a technical report.
    Ichikawa T; Ishida O; Watanabe M; Tomotake Y; Wei H; Jianrong C
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):487-9. PubMed ID: 18544129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.
    Murmura G; Di Iorio D; Cicchetti AR; Sinjari B; Caputi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 21231867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.
    Paiva J; Givan DA; Broome JC; Lemons JE; McCracken MS
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):656-62. PubMed ID: 19682220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
    Karl M; Holst S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures.
    Cheshire PD; Hobkirk JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 23(11):782-9. PubMed ID: 8953484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of framework soldering on the deformation of implant abutments after framework seating: a study with strain gauges.
    Mendes Sde N; Edwards Rezende CE; Moretti Neto RT; Capello Sousa EA; Henrique Rubo J
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits.
    Jemt T; Lekholm U; Johansson CB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 11359257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Operator-induced compressive axial forces during implant gold screw fastening.
    Pesun IJ; Brosky ME; Korioth TW; Hodges J; Devoe BJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11458259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Salvaging an angled implant abutment with damaged internal threads: a clinical report.
    Imam AY; Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB; McGlumphy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 23684277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.
    do Nascimento C; Pedrazzi V; Miani PK; Moreira LD; de Albuquerque RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1394-7. PubMed ID: 19709063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.