These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24392845)

  • 21. Automatic NOESY assignment in CS-RASREC-Rosetta.
    Lange OF
    J Biomol NMR; 2014 Jul; 59(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 24831340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the quality of NMR and crystallographic protein structures by means of a conformational database potential derived from structure databases.
    Kuszewski J; Gronenborn AM; Clore GM
    Protein Sci; 1996 Jun; 5(6):1067-80. PubMed ID: 8762138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A general method for the unbiased improvement of solution NMR structures by the use of related X-ray data, the AUREMOL-ISIC algorithm.
    Brunner K; Gronwald W; Trenner JM; Neidig KP; Kalbitzer HR
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16800891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practically useful: what the Rosetta protein modeling suite can do for you.
    Kaufmann KW; Lemmon GH; Deluca SL; Sheehan JH; Meiler J
    Biochemistry; 2010 Apr; 49(14):2987-98. PubMed ID: 20235548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. refineD: improved protein structure refinement using machine learning based restrained relaxation.
    Bhattacharya D
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3320-3328. PubMed ID: 30759180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guiding automated NMR structure determination using a global optimization metric, the NMR DP score.
    Huang YJ; Mao B; Xu F; Montelione GT
    J Biomol NMR; 2015 Aug; 62(4):439-51. PubMed ID: 26081575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. COCO: a simple tool to enrich the representation of conformational variability in NMR structures.
    Laughton CA; Orozco M; Vranken W
    Proteins; 2009 Apr; 75(1):206-16. PubMed ID: 18831040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. X-ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design.
    Schneider M; Fu X; Keating AE
    Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 19422060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reintroducing electrostatics into protein X-ray structure refinement: bulk solvent treated as a dielectric continuum.
    Moulinier L; Case DA; Simonson T
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2003 Dec; 59(Pt 12):2094-103. PubMed ID: 14646067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. NMRe: a web server for NMR protein structure refinement with high-quality structure validation scores.
    Ryu H; Lim G; Sung BH; Lee J
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):611-3. PubMed ID: 26504145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of the AMPLE cluster-and-truncate approach to NMR structures for molecular replacement.
    Bibby J; Keegan RM; Mayans O; Winn MD; Rigden DJ
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2013 Nov; 69(Pt 11):2194-201. PubMed ID: 24189230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3D Computational Modeling of Proteins Using Sparse Paramagnetic NMR Data.
    Pilla KB; Otting G; Huber T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1526():3-21. PubMed ID: 27896733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protein structure prediction using sparse NOE and RDC restraints with Rosetta in CASP13.
    Kuenze G; Meiler J
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1341-1350. PubMed ID: 31292988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simultaneous use of solution NMR and X-ray data in REFMAC5 for joint refinement/detection of structural differences.
    Rinaldelli M; Ravera E; Calderone V; Parigi G; Murshudov GN; Luchinat C
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2014 Apr; 70(Pt 4):958-67. PubMed ID: 24699641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rosetta Structure Prediction as a Tool for Solving Difficult Molecular Replacement Problems.
    DiMaio F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1607():455-466. PubMed ID: 28573585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CS-ROSETTA.
    Nerli S; Sgourakis NG
    Methods Enzymol; 2019; 614():321-362. PubMed ID: 30611429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Free-energy calculations highlight differences in accuracy between X-ray and NMR structures and add value to protein structure prediction.
    Lee MR; Kollman PA
    Structure; 2001 Oct; 9(10):905-16. PubMed ID: 11591346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
    Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A structure refinement protocol combining NMR residual dipolar couplings and small angle scattering restraints.
    Gabel F; Simon B; Nilges M; Petoukhov M; Svergun D; Sattler M
    J Biomol NMR; 2008 Aug; 41(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 18670889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Core packing of well-defined X-ray and NMR structures is the same.
    Grigas AT; Liu Z; Regan L; O'Hern CS
    Protein Sci; 2022 Aug; 31(8):e4373. PubMed ID: 35900019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.