BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24392977)

  • 1. Reliably basing conclusions on subgroups of randomized clinical trials.
    Koch A; Framke T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 24392977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and evaluation of multiregional trials with heterogeneous treatment effect across regions.
    Chen CT; Hung HM; Hsiao CF
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012 Sep; 22(5):1037-50. PubMed ID: 22946948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An urn model for odds-ratio-based response-adaptive phase III clinical trials for two or more treatments.
    Basak GK; Biswas A; Volkov S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):838-56. PubMed ID: 20183447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from schizophrenia trials in support of new drug applications submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration.
    Khin NA; Chen YF; Yang Y; Yang P; Laughren TP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2012 Jun; 73(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 22687813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical principles: myths or facts?
    Sylvester R
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 14709923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized clinical trial: myths around elementary statistical principles.
    Edler L; Kopp-Schneider A
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 14709929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An overview of statistical and regulatory issues in the planning, analysis, and interpretation of subgroup analyses in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Hemmings R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 24392975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design.
    Koch A
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 16972708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials: are most of them misleading?
    Hernández AV; Boersma E; Murray GD; Habbema JD; Steyerberg EW
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 16442886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview of statistical planning to address subgroups in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Koch GG; Schwartz TA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 24392979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Introduction to the statistical aspects of planning clinical oncologic phase III studies].
    Sylvester R; Minder CE
    Urologe A; 1995 Sep; 34(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 7483152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials.
    Sargent DJ; Goldberg RM
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1051-60. PubMed ID: 11276035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How practical are adaptive designs likely to be for confirmatory trials?
    Gould AL
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):644-9; discussion 660-2. PubMed ID: 16972716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The FDA outlook of events reporting after ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATO Trial: impact of sponsor censoring dates, drug discontinuation, and withdrawal of consent.
    Serebruany VL
    Cardiology; 2011; 120(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 22418766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of new drug applications.
    Khin NA; Chen YF; Yang Y; Yang P; Laughren TP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 72(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 21527123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying sensitivity analyses to overall survival in cancer clinical trials.
    Wolff SN
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 28(19):e323; author reply e324. PubMed ID: 20516448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subgroup Analyses in Reporting of Phase III Clinical Trials in Solid Tumors.
    Zhang S; Liang F; Li W; Hu X
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 33(15):1697-702. PubMed ID: 25897150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive designs for binary treatment responses in phase III clinical trials: controversies and progress.
    Biswas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):353-64. PubMed ID: 11697227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian models for subgroup analysis in clinical trials.
    Jones HE; Ohlssen DI; Neuenschwander B; Racine A; Branson M
    Clin Trials; 2011 Apr; 8(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 21282293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missing data in IPF trials: do not let methodological issues undermine a major therapeutic breakthrough.
    Thabut G; Crestani B; Porcher R; Richeldi L
    Eur Respir J; 2015 Sep; 46(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 26324692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.