These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24393198)

  • 1. The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients.
    Udeh BL; Costandi S; Dalton JE; Ghosh R; Yousef H; Mekhail N
    Pain Pract; 2015 Feb; 15(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 24393198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices.
    Tapp SJ; Martin BI; Tosteson TD; Lurie JD; Weinstein MC; Deyo RA; Mirza SK; Tosteson ANA
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):584-592. PubMed ID: 28847740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor Regarding "The Two Year Cost Effectiveness of Three Options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients".
    Mekail N; Udeh B
    Pain Pract; 2014 Sep; 14(7):e163-4. PubMed ID: 25124314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regarding: Udeh BL, et al. The 2-year Cost-effectiveness of 3 Options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients. Pain Pract 2014 Jan 3 [epub ahead of print].
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Hirsch JA
    Pain Pract; 2014 Sep; 14(7):e161-2. PubMed ID: 25113809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.
    Burnett MG; Stein SC; Bartels RH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jul; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 20594016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial of the X-Stop interspinous distractor device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with 2-year quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
    Borg A; Hill CS; Nurboja B; Critchley G; Choi D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Apr; 34(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33530059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
    Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections.
    Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
    Pain Manag; 2022 Mar; 12(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 34344197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding whether chronic lower back pain patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from multiple epidural steroid injections prior to the
    Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
    Pain Manag; 2022 Apr; 12(3):261-266. PubMed ID: 34751594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost utility analysis of caudal epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, axial or discogenic low back pain, central spinal stenosis, and post lumbar surgery syndrome.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Pampati V; Cash KA; Benyamin RM; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(3):E129-43. PubMed ID: 23703415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).
    Cairns K; Deer T; Sayed D; van Noort K; Liang K
    Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. PubMed ID: 31808529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar spinal stenosis: therapeutic options review.
    Costandi S; Chopko B; Mekhail M; Dews T; Mekhail N
    Pain Pract; 2015 Jan; 15(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 24725422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.