These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24394492)

  • 1. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
    Roberfroid M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():390. PubMed ID: 24394492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
    Rosanoff A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():389. PubMed ID: 24394485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter to the editor. retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
    Folta K
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():392. PubMed ID: 24394484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
    John B
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():391. PubMed ID: 24394483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabrication, falsification et Al.
    Reider B
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 20194952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editor in Chief of Food and Chemical Toxicology answers questions on retraction.
    Wallace Hayes A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():394-5. PubMed ID: 24407018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modellers seek reason for low retraction rates.
    Butler D; Hogan J
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):236-7. PubMed ID: 17507938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication ethics.
    Freeman PB
    Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science forced to retract article on "ecstasy".
    Pincock S
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7415):579. PubMed ID: 12969906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
    Wylie DT
    Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on the correspondence by Cokol et al.
    Liu SV
    EMBO Rep; 2007 Sep; 8(9):792-3; author reply 793. PubMed ID: 17767183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retraction recommended for enzyme-chip paper.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):540-1. PubMed ID: 20671680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting the literature--retraction and republication.
    Fontanarosa PB; DeAngelis CD
    JAMA; 2005 May; 293(20):2536. PubMed ID: 15914757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can we trust your data?
    Moore S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Nov; 38(6):615. PubMed ID: 22037323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When the MPU becomes the AMPB.
    Wissow L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Apr; 61(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16504453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dropped genetics paper lacked scientific merit.
    Risch N; Piazza A; Cavalli-Sforza LL
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6868):115. PubMed ID: 11805804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrity in research publishing and professional accountability.
    Holt GR
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2013 May; 15(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 23411572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.