963 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24394585)
1. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of lingual plate perforation for virtual immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A computer simulation study.
Huang RY; Cochran DL; Cheng WC; Lin MH; Fan WH; Sung CE; Mau LP; Huang PH; Shieh YS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Oct; 146(10):735-42. PubMed ID: 26409983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors that are associated with injury to the inferior alveolar nerve in high-risk patients after removal of third molars.
Selvi F; Dodson TB; Nattestad A; Robertson K; Tolstunov L
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):868-73. PubMed ID: 24012054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the shape of the inferior alveolar canal as a marker for increased risk of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve at third molar surgery: a prospective study.
Shiratori K; Nakamori K; Ueda M; Sonoda T; Dehari H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 71(12):2012-9. PubMed ID: 24045186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the risk of perforation of the mandibular canal by implant drill using density and thickness parameters.
Başa O; Dilek OC
Gerodontology; 2011 Sep; 28(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 20236331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Brooks SL; Fu JH; Yeh CY; Rudek I; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21044167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximity of the mandibular canal to the tooth apex.
Kovisto T; Ahmad M; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2011 Mar; 37(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 21329813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thickness of buccal bone in the mandible and its clinical significance in mono-cortical screws placement. A CBCT analysis.
Al-Jandan BA; Al-Sulaiman AA; Marei HF; Syed FA; Almana M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 22824249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of the angle range in trans-inferior alveolar nerve implantation at the mandibular second molar.
Wu W; Song L; Liu J; Du L; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Tang Z; Shen M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):928. PubMed ID: 38007495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Nakayama K; Nonoyama M; Takaki Y; Kagawa T; Yuasa K; Izumi K; Ozeki S; Ikebe T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2587-91. PubMed ID: 19925976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronectomy: a surgical option for impacted third molars in close proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve.
Monaco G; de Santis G; Gatto MR; Corinaldesi G; Marchetti C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 22467696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
Guerrero ME; Nackaerts O; Beinsberger J; Horner K; Schoenaers J; Jacobs R;
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 22705219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study.
Chen H; Wang W; Gu X
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):478. PubMed ID: 34579702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the variation in course and position of inferior alveolar nerve among south Indian population: A cone beam computed tomographic study.
Kavarthapu A; Thamaraiselvan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):405-409. PubMed ID: 30127186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of panoramic radiography in determination of neurosensory disturbances related to dental implant placement in posterior mandible.
Kütük N; Gönen ZB; Yaşar MT; Demirbaş AE; Alkan A
Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):648-52. PubMed ID: 25365650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined preoperative measurement of three inferior alveolar canal factors using computed tomography predicts the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury during lower third molar extraction.
Tachinami H; Tomihara K; Fujiwara K; Nakamori K; Noguchi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(11):1479-1483. PubMed ID: 28602570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
