316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24394604)
21. Urodynamic evaluation of sacral neuromodulation for urge urinary incontinence.
Groenendijk PM; Lycklama à Nyeholt AA; Heesakkers JP; van Kerrebroeck PE; Hassouna MM; Gajewski JB; Cappellano F; Siegel SW; Fall M; Dijkema HE; Jonas U; van den Hombergh U;
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 18070199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Wöllner J; Krebs J; Pannek J
Spinal Cord; 2016 Feb; 54(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 26215913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does sacral neuromodulation lead to relevant reduction in the need for intermittent catheterization? A single-center experience on patients with chronic urinary retention.
Denzinger S; Nowrotek A; Weingart P; Burger M; Wieland WF; Rößler W; Otto W
Neuromodulation; 2012; 15(6):586-91; discussion 591. PubMed ID: 22672285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Value of Ambulatory Urodynamics in the Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Sacral Neuromodulation.
Drossaerts J; Rademakers KLJ; Rahnama'i SM; Marcelissen T; Van Kerrebroeck P; van Koeveringe G
Urol Int; 2019; 102(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 30612126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimizing the duration of assessment of stage-1 sacral neuromodulation in nonobstructive chronic urinary retention.
Elneil S; Abtahi B; Helal M; Digesu A; Gonzales G
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jan; 17(1):66-70; discussion 70-1. PubMed ID: 23601054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sacral neuromodulation in urological indications: the Finnish experience.
Vaarala MH; Tammela TL; Perttilä I; Luukkonen P; Hellström P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Feb; 45(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 20961268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes of electrical stimulation of the neurogenic bladder: results of a two-year follow-up study.
Radziszewski K
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(4):867-73. PubMed ID: 23867413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of sacral neuromodulation treatment success in men with impaired bladder emptying-time for a new diagnostic approach.
Rademakers KL; Drossaerts JM; van Kerrebroeck PE; Oelke M; van Koeveringe GA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):808-810. PubMed ID: 27062496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new minimally invasive procedure for pudendal nerve stimulation to treat neurogenic bladder: description of the method and preliminary data.
Spinelli M; Malaguti S; Giardiello G; Lazzeri M; Tarantola J; Van Den Hombergh U
Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 15977260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Neurosurgical treatment of hyperactive bladder in spinal cord injury patients].
Bauchet L; Segnarbieux F; Martinazzo G; Frerebeau P; Ohanna F
Neurochirurgie; 2001 Feb; 47(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 11283451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of acute sacral neuromodulation on bladder reflex in complete spinal cord injury rats.
Shi P; Zhao X; Wang J; Lan N
Neuromodulation; 2013; 16(6):583-9; discussion 589. PubMed ID: 23127206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term course of sacral anterior root stimulation in spinal cord injured individuals: The fate of the detrusor.
Krebs J; Wöllner J; Grasmücke D; Pannek J
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Aug; 36(6):1596-1600. PubMed ID: 27778371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sacral neuromodulation treatment for urinary voiding dysfunctions: results of treatment with the largest single-center series in a tertiary referral center in Turkey.
Kütükoğlu MU; Altuntaş T; Şahin B; Onur AR
Turk J Med Sci; 2023 Feb; 53(1):206-210. PubMed ID: 36945940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Medium-term experience of sacral neuromodulation by tined lead implantation.
Van Voskuilen AC; Oerlemans DJ; Weil EH; van den Hombergh U; van Kerrebroeck PE
BJU Int; 2007 Jan; 99(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 16956350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Effectiveness and safety of sacral neuromodulation on neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction in patients with spina bifida].
Chen G; Wang Y; Ying X; Pang D; Liao L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1374-1379. PubMed ID: 34779161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Video-urodynamics efficacy of sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic bladder guided by three-dimensional imaging CT and C-arm fluoroscopy: a single-center prospective study.
Shan S; Zhu W; Zhang G; Zhang Q; Che Y; Wen J; Wang Q
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16306. PubMed ID: 36175471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sacral neurostimulation for urinary retention: 10-year experience from one UK centre.
Datta SN; Chaliha C; Singh A; Gonzales G; Mishra VC; Kavia RB; Kitchen N; Fowler CJ; Elneil S
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 17970787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Urodynamic findings during the filling phase in neurogenic bladder patients with or without vesicoureteral reflux who have undergone sacral neuromodulation.
Chen G; Liao L; Wang Y; Ying X
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1410-1416. PubMed ID: 32282088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Results of a prospective, multicenter study evaluating quality of life, safety, and efficacy of sacral neuromodulation at twelve months in subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder.
Noblett K; Siegel S; Mangel J; Griebling TL; Sutherland SE; Bird ET; Comiter C; Culkin D; Bennett J; Zylstra S; Kan F; Berg KC
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Feb; 35(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 25546568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spastic bladder and spinal cord injury: seventeen years of experience with sacral deafferentation and implantation of an anterior root stimulator.
Kutzenberger J; Domurath B; Sauerwein D
Artif Organs; 2005 Mar; 29(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 15725225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
