These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24395075)

  • 1. Response to comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias'.
    Kaizar EE; Vydra TP
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):538-9. PubMed ID: 24395075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias' by Taylor R. Pressler and Eloise E. Kaizar, Statistics in Medicine 2013.
    Schmidt AF; Hoes AW; Groenwold RH
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):536-7. PubMed ID: 24395074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias.
    Pressler TR; Kaizar EE
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3552-68. PubMed ID: 23553373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
    Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures.
    Ross ME; Kreider AR; Huang YS; Matone M; Rubin DM; Localio AR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 181(12):989-95. PubMed ID: 25995287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity scores.
    Cummings P
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2008 Aug; 162(8):734-7. PubMed ID: 18678805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
    Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
    Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
    Stuart BL; Grebel LE; Butler CC; Hood K; Verheij TJM; Little P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Sep; 67(662):e643-e649. PubMed ID: 28760739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostics for Confounding of Time-varying and Other Joint Exposures.
    Jackson JW
    Epidemiology; 2016 Nov; 27(6):859-69. PubMed ID: 27479649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Propensity score: Interests, use and limitations. A practical guide for clinicians].
    Moulis G; Lapeyre-Mestre M
    Rev Med Interne; 2018 Oct; 39(10):805-812. PubMed ID: 29514739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.
    Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1142-7. PubMed ID: 18453634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.