These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24395762)

  • 1. LEGO plot for simultaneous application of multiple quality requirements during trueness verification of quantitative laboratory tests.
    Park HI; Chae H; Kim M; Lee J; Kim Y
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2014 Mar; 28(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 24395762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of cholesterol bias due to a matrix effect of external quality assurance samples: how true is your cholesterol method?
    Pretorius CJ; Klingberg S; Johnson L; Park R; Wilgen U; Ungerer JP
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2012 Nov; 49(Pt 6):538-41. PubMed ID: 23019601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Requirements for reproducibility, trueness and error of measurement in internal quality control schemes.
    Bonvicini P; Metus P; Pavón MA; Tocchini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 May; 41(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 12812269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deriving proper measurement uncertainty from Internal Quality Control data: An impossible mission?
    Ceriotti F
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jul; 57():37-40. PubMed ID: 29605551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trueness verification of actual creatinine assays in the European market demonstrates a disappointing variability that needs substantial improvement. An international study in the framework of the EC4 creatinine standardization working group.
    Delanghe JR; Cobbaert C; Galteau MM; Harmoinen A; Jansen R; Kruse R; Laitinen P; Thienpont LM; Wuyts B; Weykamp C; Panteghini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(9):1319-25. PubMed ID: 18605952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA.
    Thelen MHM; Jansen RTP; Weykamp CW; Steigstra H; Meijer R; Cobbaert CM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 28182577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of calculating sigma metrics by a trueness verification proficiency testing-based approach and an internal quality control data inter-laboratory comparison-based approach.
    Li R; Wang T; Gong L; Peng P; Yang S; Zhao H; Xiong P
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Nov; 33(9):e22989. PubMed ID: 31386228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sigma metric analysis for performance of creatinine with fresh frozen serum.
    Kang F; Zhang C; Wang W; Wang Z
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2016; 76(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 26450266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements for 8 common analytes in native sera identify inadequate standardization among 6 routine laboratory assays.
    Stepman HC; Tiikkainen U; Stöckl D; Vesper HW; Edwards SH; Laitinen H; Pelanti J; Thienpont LM;
    Clin Chem; 2014 Jun; 60(6):855-63. PubMed ID: 24687951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy controls: assessing trueness (bias).
    Armbruster D
    Clin Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 33(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 23331733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Verification/validation of the performances of analytical method].
    Vassault A; Hulin A; Chapuzet E; Arnaud J; Giroud C;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():247-94. PubMed ID: 21613021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use.
    Jansen RT; Slingerland RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 20459353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verification of examination procedures in clinical laboratory for imprecision, trueness and diagnostic accuracy according to ISO 15189:2012: a pragmatic approach.
    Antonelli G; Padoan A; Aita A; Sciacovelli L; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1501-1508. PubMed ID: 28222014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The top-down approach to measurement uncertainty: which formula should we use in laboratory medicine?
    Martinello F; Snoj N; Skitek M; Jerin A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020101. PubMed ID: 32292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Wiebe DA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of electrolyte measurements assessed by a trueness verification program.
    Ge M; Zhao H; Yan Y; Zhang T; Zeng J; Zhou W; Wang Y; Meng Q; Zhang C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 54(8):1319-27. PubMed ID: 27010777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative analyses of reference values used in Polish medical diagnostic laboratories for selected biochemical investigations].
    Przybył-Hac B; Brzeziński AM; Paradowski M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2013 Jul; 35(205):28-36. PubMed ID: 23984602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Candidate reference methods for determining target values for cholesterol, creatinine, uric acid, and glucose in external quality assessment and internal accuracy control. I. Method setup.
    Stöckl D; Reinauer H
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jun; 39(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 8504568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of serum creatinine measurement in light of EQA programs.
    Friedecky B; Kratochvila J; Budina M; Jabor A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(5):685-8. PubMed ID: 17484635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.