These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24395780)

  • 1. Perfect genetic correlation between number of offspring and grandoffspring in an industrialized human population.
    Zietsch BP; Kuja-Halkola R; Walum H; Verweij KJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jan; 111(3):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24395780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of resource availability and the demographic transition on the genetic correlation between number of children and grandchildren in humans.
    Bolund E; Lummaa V
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Feb; 118(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 27624115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The genetic and environmental structure of reproduction-related variables: the case of fertility and breastfeeding.
    Colodro-Conde L; Rijsdijk F; Ordoñana JR
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2013 Dec; 16(6):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24050145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heritability and genetic constraints of life-history trait evolution in preindustrial humans.
    Pettay JE; Kruuk LE; Jokela J; Lummaa V
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Feb; 102(8):2838-43. PubMed ID: 15701704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long-lasting legacy of reproduction: lifetime reproductive success shapes expected genetic contributions of humans after 10 generations.
    Young EA; Chesterton E; Lummaa V; Postma E; Dugdale HL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 May; 290(1998):20230287. PubMed ID: 37161329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No genetic contribution to variation in human offspring sex ratio: a total population study of 4.7 million births.
    Zietsch BP; Walum H; Lichtenstein P; Verweij KJH; Kuja-Halkola R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Feb; 287(1921):20192849. PubMed ID: 32070249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evolutionary perspective on reproductive individual heterogeneity in a marine vertebrate.
    Chambert T; Rotella JJ; Garrott RA
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Sep; 83(5):1158-68. PubMed ID: 24673453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
    Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society.
    Goodman A; Koupil I; Lawson DW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Nov; 279(1746):4342-51. PubMed ID: 22933371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring selection for genes that promote long life in a historical human population.
    Moorad JA; Walling CA
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2017 Nov; 1(11):1773-1781. PubMed ID: 28993657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural selection on fecundity variance in subdivided populations: kin selection meets bet hedging.
    Lehmann L; Balloux F
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):361-77. PubMed ID: 17339208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The opportunity for selection: A slippery concept in ecology and evolution.
    Reed TE; Visser ME; Waples RS
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Jan; 92(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 36366942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fecundity and life-history strategies in marine invertebrates.
    Ramirez Llodra E
    Adv Mar Biol; 2002; 43():87-170. PubMed ID: 12154615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.
    Grieshop K; Arnqvist G
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):e2006810. PubMed ID: 30533008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution and consequences of sex-specific reproductive variance.
    Mullon C; Reuter M; Lehmann L
    Genetics; 2014 Jan; 196(1):235-52. PubMed ID: 24172130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twin study.
    Kirk KM; Blomberg SP; Duffy DL; Heath AC; Owens IP; Martin NG
    Evolution; 2001 Feb; 55(2):423-35. PubMed ID: 11308097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The offspring quantity-quality trade-off and human fertility variation.
    Lawson DW; Borgerhoff Mulder M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 371(1692):20150145. PubMed ID: 27022072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Month of birth predicted reproductive success and fitness in pre-modern Canadian women.
    Lummaa V; Tremblay M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Nov; 270(1531):2355-61. PubMed ID: 14667351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of intergenerational family sizes suggests a genetic component of reproductive fitness.
    Pluzhnikov A; Nolan DK; Tan Z; McPeek MS; Ober C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 81(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 17564973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural selection on age-specific fertilities in human females: comparison of individual-level fitness measures.
    Käär P; Jokela J
    Proc Biol Sci; 1998 Dec; 265(1413):2415-20. PubMed ID: 9921680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.