These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24397040)

  • 1. Importance of clinical assessment in diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its role in decreasing negative appendicectomy rate.
    Mehraj A; Naqvi MA; Din HU; Waqas
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 24397040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'To have...or not to have'. Should computed tomography and ultrasonography be implemented as a routine work-up for patients with suspected acute appendicitis in a regional hospital?
    Chiang DT; Tan EI; Birks D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2008 Jan; 90(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 18201492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
    Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative appendicectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and Alvarado score.
    Kundiona I; Chihaka OB; Muguti GI
    Cent Afr J Med; 2015; 61(9-12):66-73. PubMed ID: 29144064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging.
    Karakas SP; Guelfguat M; Leonidas JC; Springer S; Singh SP
    Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Feb; 30(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10663520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alvarado score: a guide to computed tomography utilization in appendicitis.
    Tan WJ; Pek W; Kabir T; Goh YC; Chan WH; Wong WK; Ong HS
    ANZ J Surg; 2013 Oct; 83(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 23351046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does an Acute Surgical Model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis?
    Brockman SF; Scott S; Guest GD; Stupart DA; Ryan S; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2013 Oct; 83(10):744-7. PubMed ID: 23692520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-Operative Imaging can Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rate in Acute Appendicitis.
    Chan J; Fan KS; Mak TLA; Loh SY; Ng SWY; Adapala R
    Ulster Med J; 2020 Jan; 89(1):25-28. PubMed ID: 32218624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of ultrasound in acute appendicitis.
    Mardan MA; Mufti TS; Khattak IU; Chilkunda N; Alshayeb AA; Mohammad AM; ur Rehman Z
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19(3):72-9. PubMed ID: 18444596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiological imaging to improve the emergency department diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    Rosengren D; Brown AF; Chu K
    Emerg Med Australas; 2004; 16(5-6):410-6. PubMed ID: 15537403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Routine ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis].
    Niebuhr H; Nahrstedt U; Born O
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 4():26-8. PubMed ID: 9880866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute appendicitis--a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy.
    Borgstein PJ; Gordijn RV; Eijsbouts QA; Cuesta MA
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Sep; 11(9):923-7. PubMed ID: 9294274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
    Balthazar EJ; Rofsky NM; Zucker R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 May; 93(5):768-71. PubMed ID: 9625125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unnecessary appendicectomy in suspected cases of acute appendicitis.
    Das MK; Gautam D; Roy H; Mukherjee A; Gaurav R; Sen S
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2009 Jun; 107(6):354, 356-7. PubMed ID: 19886373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
    Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Utility of high-resonance ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].
    Moënne K; Fernández M; Palma R; Pefaur R; Gallardo S
    Rev Med Chil; 1992 Dec; 120(12):1383-7. PubMed ID: 1343378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Fewer unnecessary appendectomies following ultrasonography and CT].
    Leeuwenburgh MM; Bakker OJ; Gorzeman MP; Bollen TL; Seldenrijk CA; Go PM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A869. PubMed ID: 20456809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.
    McDonald GP; Pendarvis DP; Wilmoth R; Daley BJ
    Am Surg; 2001 Nov; 67(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11730216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study.
    Zielke A; Hasse C; Sitter H; Rothmund M
    Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9562281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased use of pre-operative imaging and laparoscopy has no impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing appendicectomy.
    Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Cunningham J; Burd C; Bond-Smith G; Kurzawinski TR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Nov; 93(8):620-3. PubMed ID: 22041239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.