179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24397244)
1. Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters.
Mei-Dan E; Walfisch A; Valencia C; Hallak M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1765-70. PubMed ID: 24397244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.
Walfisch A; Mei-Dan E; Hallak M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):848-53. PubMed ID: 24939630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.
Mei-Dan E; Walfisch A; Suarez-Easton S; Hallak M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):723-7. PubMed ID: 21806490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Durie D; Lawal A; Zegelbone P
Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 26341067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical analysis of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in 66 cases].
He Y; Hu J; Zhang X; Huang H; Chen Q
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):741-5. PubMed ID: 25537244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Uccella S; Agosti M; Serati M; Marchitelli G; Bolis P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 207(2):125.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22704766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial.
Rab MT; Mohammed AB; Zahran KA; Hassan MM; Eldeen AR; Ebrahim EM; Yehia M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jul; 28(10):1181-5. PubMed ID: 25048751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extra-amniotic saline infusion increases cesarean risk versus other induction methods and spontaneous labor.
Levey KA; Arslan AA; Funai EF
Am J Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):435-8. PubMed ID: 17001554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.
Cheuk QK; Lo TK; Lee CP; Yeung AP
Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 25999032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lassey SC; Haber HR; Kanbergs A; Robinson JN; Little SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):611.e1-611.e8. PubMed ID: 33771496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening.
Sharami SH; Milani F; Zahiri Z; Mansour-Ghanaei F
Med Sci Monit; 2005 Aug; 11(8):CR381-6. PubMed ID: 16049380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Wang W; Zheng J; Fu J; Zhang X; Ma Q; Yu S; Li M; Hou L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1805-8. PubMed ID: 24397441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus.
Xing Y; Li N; Ji Q; Hong L; Wang X; Xing B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():139-143. PubMed ID: 31704530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion.
Karjane NW; Brock EL; Walsh SW
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):234-9. PubMed ID: 16449106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Hoppe KK; Schiff MA; Peterson SE; Gravett MG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(12):1919-25. PubMed ID: 26302817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
