114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24397308)
1. Do pregnant women prefer timing of elective cesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks of gestation? Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial.
Glavind J; Henriksen TB; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1782-6. PubMed ID: 24397308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
Glavind J; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N; Khalil M; Møller AM; Mortensen BB; Rasmussen OB; Christensen JT; Jørgensen JS; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2013 Aug; 120(9):1123-32. PubMed ID: 23682628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scheduling the Stork: Media Portrayals of Women's and Physicians' Reasons for Elective Cesarean Delivery.
Campo-Engelstein L; Howland LE; Parker WM; Burcher P
Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 25881794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?
Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practice of primary elective cesarean upon maternal request in the commonwealth of virginia.
Alnaif B; Beydoun H
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012; 41(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 22789013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system.
Dweik D; Girasek E; Mészáros G; Töreki A; Keresztúri A; Pál A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1025-33. PubMed ID: 25066090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Timing and consequences of early term and late term deliveries.
Parikh L; Singh J; Timofeev J; Zahn CM; Istwan NB; Rhea DJ; Driggers RW
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jul; 27(11):1158-62. PubMed ID: 24134662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-initiated elective cesarean section of nulliparous women in British Columbia, Canada.
Hutton EK; Kornelsen J
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 23281899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Timing the provision of a pregnancy decision-aid: temporal patterns of preference for mode of birth during pregnancy.
Shorten A; Shorten B
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Oct; 97(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25082724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Timing of Elective Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes in Term Singleton Deliveries: A Single-Center Experience.
Takahashi D; Fujino Y; Sato T; Kuramoto A; Kawakami S; Ito M; Goto K
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e2776-e2785. PubMed ID: 37607591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Swedish couples' attitudes towards birth, childbirth fear and birth preferences and relation to mode of birth - a longitudinal cohort study.
Hildingsson I
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2014 Jun; 5(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 24814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Respiratory dysfunction in infants born by elective cesarean section without labor].
Dónaldsson SF; Dagbjartsson A; Bergsteinsson H; Hardardóttir H; Haraldsson A; Thórkelsson T
Laeknabladid; 2007 Oct; 93(10):675-9. PubMed ID: 17909278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of timing of elective cesarean section on neonatal resuscitation risk.
Zanardo V; Simbi KA; Vedovato S; Trevisanuto D
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2004 Nov; 5(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 15530194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
Glavind J; Henriksen TB; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e84744. PubMed ID: 24376842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
Hildingsson I
Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
