These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24397308)

  • 41. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial.
    Dodd JM; Crowther CA; Haslam RR; Robinson JS;
    BJOG; 2012 Jul; 119(8):964-73. PubMed ID: 22691051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preference toward future mode of delivery: how do antepartum preferences and prior delivery experience contribute?
    Sparks TN; Yeaton-Massey A; Granados JM; Handler SJ; Meyer MR; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(14):1673-8. PubMed ID: 25212977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
    Sanu O
    BJOG; 2013 Dec; 120(13):1703. PubMed ID: 24589008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences?
    Deng W; Klemetti R; Long Q; Wu Z; Duan C; Zhang WH; Ronsmans C; Zhang Y; Hemminki E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Aug; 14():285. PubMed ID: 25148697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
    Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Catastrophizing mediates the relationship between fear of pain and preference for elective caesarean section.
    Dehghani M; Sharpe L; Khatibi A
    Eur J Pain; 2014 Apr; 18(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 24115590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Author's reply: elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
    Glavind J
    BJOG; 2013 Dec; 120(13):1703-4. PubMed ID: 24589007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Information for women after CS: are they getting enough?
    Lucas A
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Nov; 7(11):472-5. PubMed ID: 15612178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?
    Roman H; Blondel B; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 18598118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery.
    Salim R; Shalev E
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2010 Jun; 8():68. PubMed ID: 20565934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sources of influence on pregnant women's preferred mode of delivery in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    Amyx M; Gibbons L; Xiong X; Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Buekens P; Belizán JM
    Birth; 2018 Mar; 45(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 28856723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial Are we trivialising neonatal intensive care unit admissions?
    Amorim MM; Nakamura-Pereira M; Takemoto ML; Knobel R; Katz L; Andreucci CB
    BJOG; 2013 Dec; 120(13):1702. PubMed ID: 24589005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear.
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):45.e1-9. PubMed ID: 21620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery.
    Palatnik A; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):358.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25725658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Authors' reply: elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial Are we trivialising neonatal intensive care unit admissions?
    Glavind J; Uldbjerg N; Kindberg SF; Henriksen TB
    BJOG; 2013 Dec; 120(13):1702-3. PubMed ID: 24589006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Trial of labor vs. elective repeat cesarean section. AAFP Task Force on Clinical Policies for Patient Care.
    Am Fam Physician; 1995 Nov; 52(6):1763-5. PubMed ID: 7484686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effective education to decrease elective caesarean section.
    Sanavi FS; Ansari-Moghaddam A; Shovey MF; Rakhshani F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 May; 64(5):500-5. PubMed ID: 25272532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.