95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24397385)
1. The coefficient of dominance is not (always) estimable with biallelic markers.
García-Cortés LA; Legarra A; Toro MA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Apr; 131(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 24397385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-identifiability of identity coefficients at biallelic loci.
Csűrös M
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Mar; 92():22-9. PubMed ID: 24269334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding.
de Boer IJ; Hoeschele I
Theor Appl Genet; 1993 Apr; 86(2-3):245-58. PubMed ID: 24193467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes.
de Cara MÁ; Villanueva B; Toro MÁ; Fernández J
Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(24):6091-9. PubMed ID: 24128280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating Seven Coefficients of Pairwise Relatedness Using Population-Genomic Data.
Ackerman MS; Johri P; Spitze K; Xu S; Doak TG; Young K; Lynch M
Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 28341647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inbreeding, coancestry, and covariance between relatives for X-chromosomal loci.
Grossman M; Eisen EJ
J Hered; 1989; 80(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2926116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
Ritland K
Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.
Toro MA; García-Cortés LA; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21749687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective size and F-statistics of subdivided populations for sex-linked loci.
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Apr; 55(2):176-88. PubMed ID: 10329517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Point estimation and graphical inference of marginal dominance for two viability loci controlling inbreeding depression.
Fu YB; Charlesworth D; Namkoong G
Genet Res; 1997 Oct; 70(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9449191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Identification of sibling brothers using STR and Y-biallelic markers].
Tang MY; Huang J; Cai JH; Huang XS; Xu W; Qu ZX; Shan FB; Lu HL
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 28(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 22812220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MIM: an indirect method to assess inbreeding and coancestry in large incomplete pedigrees of selected dairy cattle.
Colleau JJ; Sargolzaei M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Jun; 128(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 21554410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of coancestry based on shared segments for maintaining genetic diversity.
Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Sölkner J; de Cara MA; Mészáros G; Pérez O'Brien AM; Fernández J
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 26991632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of coancestry on accuracy of individual assignments to population of origin: examples using Great Lakes lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush).
Guinand B; Scribner KT; Page KS; Filcek K; Main L; Burnham-Curtis MK
Genetica; 2006 May; 127(1-3):329-40. PubMed ID: 16850237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data.
Slate J; David P; Dodds KG; Veenvliet BA; Glass BC; Broad TE; McEwan JC
Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Sep; 93(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15254488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relatedness coefficients and their applications for triplets and quartets of genetic markers.
Ritland K
G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38411620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte Carlo algorithm for computing the IBD matrices using incomplete marker information.
Mao Y; Xu S
Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Mar; 94(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 15367908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
